Watch the third day of the Carly Gregg trial live-streamed below, courtesy of Court TV. This morning will probably be a key point in the trial as Gregg's expert psychiatrist, Dr. Andrew Clark, will testify in support of her insanity defense. Will his testimony be a dash to victory for the defense or a Pickett's Charge? Only time will tell.
00:00:00 MS v. Carly Gregg Day 3
00:10:55 ON THE RECORD
00:11:07 Carly Gregg Speaks
00:20:36 Juvenile defense witness 1 - S.K.
00:41:19 Defense Witness 2 - Heath Smylie, defendant’s stepfather, surviving victim
01:03:35 Defense Witness 3 - Deputy Tony Shack, Criminal Interdiction Unit, Rankin County Sheriff’s Office
03:05:31 Defense Witness 4 Dr. Andrew Clark, forensic psychiatrist, based in Cambridge, MA
06:18:35 Motion to Exclude Testimony
06:29:52 CROSS: Defense Witness 4 Dr. Andrew Clark, forensic psychiatrist
07:59:41 Redirect: Defense Witness 4 Dr. Andrew Clark, forensic psychiatrist
(31:00) Judge Arthur calls Gregg to the stand and explains her rights to her. The judge asked Gregg if she wished to testify. Gregg replied she wanted to wait and see what the testimony was. Judge Arthur said it was her right to do so and proceeded to the next witness.
36 comments:
I hope the grandparents didn’t mortgage their house for this
The video ended any hope she had.
That video. Its chilling. Thank goodness it exists cause if you just told the story, the skepticism would be high.
Feed is all wonky now. Can't even play long enough to hear a single word before it freezes up.
The insanity defense comes out.
I’m still wondering who ordered Dr Mark Webb who is classified online as forensic psychiatrist and by accounts made in media he made 4 trips to jail to interview Carly, what happened here??? Was this ordered by court and if so what was the outcome. Can anyone explain, I heard this after she was arrested he would evaluate her and did thru tv and others media, I’m no lawyer, what’s the deal???
9/18/24 at 12:00 pm, that was a defense examination. Prosecutor is not entitled to it unless he plans to testify.
After the Insanity Defense Reform Act, the defense has the burden of proving the defendant’s insanity by clear and convincing evidence, i.e. an affirmative defense.
No expert witness testifying with respect to the mental state
or condition of a defendant . . . may state an opinion or
inference as to whether the defendant did or did not have
the mental state or condition constituting an element of the
crime charged or of a defense thereto (Fed).
At the time of the crime you are charged with commit-
ting, were you so mentally ill that the court should find you
not criminally responsible? See videos.
Is voluntary drug use a defense? Nope. Is withdrawal an excuse? US V Fisher, Nope.
Dr Clark, knowing you have little neuro and pharmacological training, how can you opine that change in an SSRI is a trigger for a 15 minute episode of complete psychosis and detachment from reality? Where are the peer reviewed studies?
Civil DUI or personal injury lawyers playing in criminal court, with lives on the line. THAT ought to be a crime.
the harvard yard comes to rankin county. now that's a first.
All defendants are presumed to be sane unless they can prove that–at the time of committing the criminal act–the defendant’s state of mind caused them to:
Not have the mental capacity to know what they were doing when they committed the said act, or
That they knew what they were doing, but did not know that it was wrong.
A common example for the second prong is if a person is acting on orders from “God.”
See video. See texts. See furtive behavior. See flight. See discovery of contraband by Mom. See Stockholm Syndrome of Mr. Smiley Face and MeeMaw (whose comments were apparently of no value).
Why would you bring this forward?
to 12:37 there is no such thing as a ''civil'' dui in mississippi.
this case is not in federal court therefore the insanity defense reform act is not applicable.
parents and psychiatrists proscribing and supplying meds to a minor is not an issue since a minor cannot consent to anything.
launching a defense strategy that you are too stupid to understand is never going to be a crime.
this is for sure.........you are not a lawyer , but you play one on jackson jambalaya.
defendant is a nirvana fan. anyone remember kurt cobain?
The feed is fine and perfect at YT.
I'm going to say this again, so pay attention this time: There is no good that comes from the use of weed. Period.
Well she appeared sane and fine while being arrested as well. She was not in a trance
invariably an insanity defense comes down to one phycharist testifiyng the defendant is sane and another testifying just the opposite.
check out defendants t shirt in the video.
Who has been treating her while she waited for trial?
Good cross hammering Dr Feelgood on vol. intoxication, reports from clinicians she liked never reporting all this disassociation or voices. At all. Much less the "convenient timing" of never reporting voices until in custody. Love the "strange handwriting" journal notes and "sketch interpretation." Reminds me of the Korean Parasite art interpretation scenes. But, hey, the knife, alternative school, tats, piercing, drama claims. Sorry to see Dewey exclude this wasted afternoon but he has to. So hilarious to hear him ask Dr FeelGood about "statute" and introducing him to the "We Make it Up as We Go Along" technique. But, Mass. appears to parallel Miss in many ways on ID. Instructions will be interesting. Don't forget to cross on LITERATURE. Doc, show me the paper. The peer reviewed paper. And your pharmacy degree.
There are no winners here in this case. Carly is definitely is a troubled child. I just pray that she is put in a safe place that gets her help and is not out in society where she could potentially harm others if she has the freedom to obtain illegal substances and hang with other kids that condoned her behavior. My heart does go out to the family that is searching for answers and an answer to their hurt over a lost loved one. But she CANNOT go free and must be kept in a safe place where she cannot hurt others.
Dr. Clark's testimony is shameless! andrewclarkmd.com
to 3;58...sorry my dear , the law doesn't supply '' safe places''.....its prison or whitfield for the defendant. and no matter where she ends up.......anywhere there are incarcerated people there will be staff smuggling in contraband including illegal substances.
That hired gun psychiatrist has quite a sideline going. Gig after gig of jetting around the country, testifying for defense lawyers, and getting paid vast sums of money. This was his 151st such trial doing that...and (surprise, surprise) his first time in Mississippi.
so what's your point 6:35?
If Carly didn’t know where she was or time, blah blah like Quack Clark said; how could she read and know to text Heath and lay waiting on him? I do not concur with Dr. Clark. 100% in full capacity of her surrounding knowing EXACTLY what she was doing & that murder was wrong. She knew to hide her vape pens as well. Just wish her parents had secured their fire arms so we would not be here.
Only in Mississippi do we sentence human traffickers to nominal prison time while offering at 14 year old child a 40 year plea deal. It’s sad. It’s sad that the bumpkins will fall for the marijuana red herring. And all the attorneys I’ve seen in this case have sucked - prosecution and defense.
I loved Parasite. If you are into Korean films check out Oldboy.It’s wild..
Heard Region 8
Okay 7:06 just for you I'll spell it out. The man sells his shingle to provide custom testimonies to defense lawyers. He takes the stand, they flash his education and bona fides, and he tells the jury what the defense wants them to hear.
to 8:11...since you know so much about all this tell us what prosecution experts do?
What is a Pickett’s Charge? I have looked and can’t find out what you mean?
Many children never even have a chance due to the sick family systems they're born in to by no choice of their own. This is one of millions children that will feed the corporate correctional, corporate healthcare, and corporate media systems complexes that make gabillions off of these tragic occurrences. While we all watch Rome burn....
I could almost believe her being affected by her medication or mental problems if she didn’t hide the gun behind her back from the camera that she clearly had the ability to remember was there. Also the fact that she hid that camera before her stepdad got home. That was obviously clear thinking.
I hate to admit it but kinda agree with 8:11, otherwise, why would defense object to Mark WebbMD testifying. Why would defense not like Webb’s diagnosis and call in August for an out of state doctor hunting person when court had ordered this way before. While 99% are heartbroken over this, to let this child back out in society would be a greater health threat. Remember Luke Woodham.
September 18, 2024 at 7:06 PM, do you have another question for September 18, 2024 at 8:11 PM, while they are on the stand?
The fact she contacted a friend to come share in her deed speaks volumes.
Civil war reference
2 Friends! Don’t forget the 11th grade bike rider.
Post a Comment