Jackson Jambalaya

I'm so sick and tired of this nonsense!
Men can't get pregnant. Stop it whether this crap.

When is a woman not a woman?

When her penis is larger than yours.

"When" depends on what you're trying to accomplish.

The editor of that article raises unicorns. Dumbass

Y’all get so triggered over the smallest things.

Go woke and go Broke MSDH!

@1:03
I am not triggered. I simply will not participate in leftist delusions.

Anyone got a problem with "brood stock" ?

Stop with the minutiae. The guy was just talking and didn't intentionally mean to make a politically correct or incorrect statement. The same person uses the term "women" in the 2nd instance. This is what is wrong with our media, particularly this site. If you look long and hard enough you can find something to pick and spin - oooh gotcha! Guess it's all about the ratings and reaction.

2:26 - you may want to focus on reading comprehension instead of gender studies. In the first paragraph, there are no quotation marks indicating the words written are the writer’s words. In the second paragraph, quotation marks are used. Quotation marks are used to indicate the speakers exact words, not the writer’s interpretation as is the case in the first paragraph.

1:28 PM
I myself prefer "axolotl tanks".

Wokist patois, like most contamination, is minutely absorbed until it, like a frog brought slowly to boil from tepid water, becomes inimical to yet normalized in the culture.

Can one yet use a rainbow or certain letters of the alphabet without summoning abomination?

It was a Freudian slip and was corrected in the subsequent sentence.

226, do you have a serious reading comprehension problem, or are you just that dumb.

The first instance was the "Rewriting" by the MT editor of what was said; the paragraph underneath was what the man actually said.

MT with its leftist leanings rewrote it to suggest that persons can get pregnant. The medical professional that made the statement, from the state department of HEALTH did not ever suggest pregnant persons - only pregnant women.

Understand now? Next time read before you write. It makes life easier.

2:26, you’re right that the guy from MDHS was not intentionally trying to make a woke or politically correct comment. But the MT author of the article was. He/she purposefully changed the speaker’s comment from pregnant women to pregnant people. You’re correct that so much of the media, like MT, pick a word and then spin it to fit their woke ideology. If a writer wants to say what another person said, just simply quote them, but don’t change what they said to fit what you want said.

5:45 is correct and is apparently the only one of you paying attention. In the first paragraph, the article writer decided to change what the speaker said in order to appear more politically correct (and to please her editor who is undoubtedly well-woke).

In the later instance, the speaker was quoted and said what any normal human being would say or understand.

I'm not real sure (or sure at all) whether Krusatyr left out a word or inserted one too many with this: ("...becomes inimical to yet normalized in the culture"). (S)he do often tend to stumble when going up on the high-dive board to learn us something.

7:25
Notwithstanding that, technically, one needs "really", an adverb, in lieu of "real", an adjective, to modify "sure", an adjective, I nevertheless fathomed your intended meaning.

My point in the referenced comment was that the rot in culture can be gradual yet steady and pervasive until it is almost unknowingly transformed and decayed (or boiled and served in the case of frogs). Hence I am glad examples of decadent wokism are called out before we rot.