Attorney Abby Robinson accused the Mississippi Bar of "domestic terrorism" in a complaint filed in federal court this week.
Mrs. Robinson sued the Bar, Attorney Jeremy Birdsall, Attorney Melissa Scott, Kate Littrell, and Hinds County Circuit Judge Faye Peterson in U.S. District Court this week. The case is assigned to U.S. District Judge Kristi Johnson. Magistrate Michael Parker recused himself from the case.
Ms. Littrell, Mr. Birdsall, and Ms. Scott are attorneys for the Mississippi Bar.
The Bar adjudicated several complaints against Mrs. Robinson and scheduled a hearing on December 11.
The hearing was held but no decision has been issued. The hearing lit a fire under Mrs. Robinson as she filed her federal lawsuit ten days later.
The lawsuit makes for um, interesting reading. Spelling errors abound. The complaint accuses the defendants of
Pretty serious charges, if true. However, there is one small observation.
The attached exhibits do not include any social media posts by Mr. Birdsall. However, they do include an email exchange between the two lawyers. Abby Robinson apparently argued the Bar is not an enforcement arm of the State of Mississippi. Mr. Birdsall corrected her of that notion as he pointed out it was created by statute and the Mississippi Supreme Court designated the Bar as a disciplinary agency. The email exchange is posted below.
The complaint also throws in RICO allegations for good measure. Another curious part of the complaint is the inclusion of Hattiesburg attorney Vanessa Jones. The Bar recently suspended Ms. Jones. Mrs. Robinson represents Ms. Jones and included complaints about her treatment in the lawsuit (Improperly joined?).
The complaint is posted below. Frankly, it is convoluted and enters into a logical labyrinth that is hard to follow. Read at your own peril.
12 comments:
Growing up in the sixties and seventies, Perry Mason, Owen Marshall, Petrocelli, I came to think attorneys were our society's most intelligent people. Anymore, not so much.
Oh man this gone get good!
Is she speed running a disbar hearing?
The very first line...."unconstitional." Good grief.
The racial animus is strong in this one.
It's a good thing I read before commenting.
I might have mentioned that she forgot to mention a RICO, but sadly, she did include the RICO.
Robinson v. Bridgewater Owners Assoc, No. 25-60046 (5th Cir. 2025)
"Hope this helps,
Please advise."
I dunno if it helps.
I'm not sure she realizes it could be beyond the Please advise stage by now.
Slinging mud, hoping something might stick. He's got too much time on his hands. But everyone lawyer knows: The process is the punishment.....so make'm earn their spot on the Bar for once.
It's obvious that Ms Robinson can't be accused of using AI to write her gobbly gook.
My few dealings with Atty Robinson a few year ago (business dealings - not utilizing her then existing bar credentials) made me believe she was an incompetent individual as related to her business abilities and her ethics. This filing convinces me that I was wrong at the time - I gave her way too much credit for having at least a little bit of sense.
She should have used ChatGPT.
Post a Comment