Jackson Jambalaya

Sid, let it go bro!

Re: whether or not President Trump could legally go around CA GOV Gavin NewScum and federalize the National Guard, the answer for Democrats is the same as with universal injunctions by activist judges.

Senator Kennedy recently summed it up perfectly when stating to hypocritical, no integrity at all, University of Pennsylvania law professor Kate Shaw, when stating:

“I have little respect for your opinion, because when someone is the white house that you agree with, and someone gets a universal injunction against him, you don’t like universal injunctions. You call them judges acting like politicians in robes, and judges looking like crass political actors. But now that President Trump’s in the white house, who you dislike, you think that universal injunctions taste like pumpkin pie.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dMiMo6oFrhE

Democrats want to rule the world; and just like Democrats were for a president being able to federalize the national guard before, but are against it now, Democrats will interpret what needs to be interpreted the way they want it to be interpreted. So, we have a choice, succumb and be ruled by Democrats, or rule.

History is important. Got it. Sid is a broken record. Or a scratched CD. Or a lagging internet connection.

Let’s dig up that old horse and beat him some more.

Sid and Jerry Mitchell need to get a room.

Sad to see so many of my fellow conservatives brush away history in this comment section. There is no let it go or stop beating a dead horse. It happened, it was ugly and we should always cherish our history no matter how ugly it is. A shame so many want to throw it away

One of the assistant Attorney Generals who was standing beside Mr Meredith was asked "Which one of you gentleman is Mr Meredith?"

Comparing Ole Miss to LA is apples to oranges. And, I suspect some of those who love Trump would be thrilled if every Democrat and person of color were rounded up and deported. Want ICE to show up at our chicken plants or egg plants? It's just respectful to offer help to a governor. Kennedy was trying to reason with MS's Governor. The situation in MS was wildly different...crosses burning and Evers made it far more dangerous? Trump didn't even have someone call California's Governor's office. And, telling the media " we know where the Ayatollah is" could not be any dumber. Reckon he's in the same spot?

10:12 AM, I appreciate history. I'm thankful Salter gave us the update from 63 years ago, and to see nothing has changed. You can never tell when a Mandela moment may strike.

10:42
Newsome doesn’t want feds there, Barnett didn’t want feds there. Apples to apples
I suspect some who love Kamala want every republican deported.
I dont care where ICE shows up to arrest illegals.
Kennedy was NOT being respectful to Barnett or offering help.He was exercising his Presidential authority.
Lots of Cars burning in LA, and bricks thrown at police officers in “peaceful” protests.
You dont know whether or not Trump called Newsome.
Trump says a lot of things that are just negotiation tactics.

You can remember history and acknowledge it all you want. But, we have progressed the last 63 yrs. If people want to bask in the past horrors all year long, let them. The rest are looking forward into the future.

I think it is funny that Democrats are saying we need illegal immigrants to pick crops in the fields. Kinda sounds like something else that happened to another group of people at one time. Democrats and slaves go hand in hand.

Nonsensical comment.

10:42 AM, it always has to be apples and oranges to Democrats; because they’re hypocrisy has no boundaries…and the only thing Democrats love more than crime, are the criminals that commit the crimes.

And your “person of color were rounded up and deported” comment is sooooo typical, like Biden’s Republicans are going to put you back in chains. You leftists can’t win the debate without total bullshit propaganda lies, designed to put fear into the weak, too ill-informed to know they’re being played.

As to your opinion that "we know where the Ayatollah is" “could not be any dumber,” it’s a chess game. And whether Trump’s comment is a strategic bluff, or a psychological warfare tactic, neither you nor I know. But what we do know is, you Democrats are rooting against a positive outcome for our country…because you hate Trump so much. You literally would prefer the radicals in Iran obtain a nuclear weapon than see Trump succeed.

Democrats are haters, that hate this country, and burn and loot when they don’t get their way. Otherwise, like in the case of Trump’s meeting with Zelenskyy, and his comment towards the Ayatollah, you would STFU.

Inconvenient truth. How many Democrat leaders have said these things?

That is the thing with these clowns, they can't see past the next 5 mins. They would rather see Iran launch a nuke then to admit anything positive about Trump. Doing nothing is not a strategy when dealing with Iran.

"Finally, cooler heads prevailed, and Meredith was admitted under the guidance of federal marshals" ------------- and also the 101st Airborne with real bullets and bayonets attached. Sid left that out.

What really ironic is that the troops were sent to Ole Miss to protect protesters who supported Meredith, the troops sent to LA are there to confront protesters.

@9:39 I totally agree !!

@8:38 - you are so correct in quoting Senator Kennedy (the good one, from LA) when he pointed out that Democrats are so happy supporting Federal Judges and their nationwide declarations when they agree with them.......

But you are so blind to realize that the same story holds true for Repubicans: We lauded and clapped when the federal district judges (particularly the ones in places such as the far SW corner of Texas, where he is the only Judge within hundreds of miles) did the same thing during the past four years.

If the glove fits, you gotta wear it. (Yeah, that's not what they said in OJ's trial, but here, its appropriate.) Federal injunctions from those we like: GOOD. Nationwide injunctions we don't like: BAD.

Both sides feel the same - just on opposite sides of the fence.

on that very spot 15,234 years ago, a mastodon trampled several local residents. nobody writes about that!

4:26 PM felt the need to make the exact same point posted at 8:38 AM that Senator Kennedy made. OK.

We can all now understand, almost as sure as we woke up this morning, that Democrat U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer (the brother of ???) is FOR the national guard federalized by a Republican President being returned to a Democrat State; but would be AGAINST the national guard federalized by a Democrat President being returned to a Republican State.

And this means Charles R. Breyer is not a judge, he’s not an interpreter of the law; he’s a Democrat tool.

America has become a freak show full of evil, with so-called judges bearing much of the responsibility. When 3 Supreme Court judges, ALL DEMOCRATS, believe that mentally confused children, young kids,
not old enough to join the military,
not old enough to get a driver’s license,
not old enough to drink alcohol,
not old enough rent a vehicle,
not old enough to vote in our elections,
not old enough to rent an apartment,
not even old enough to sign up for health insurance,
ARE old enough to make a decision to mutilate themselves by cutting their parts off, it’s time to understand America’s laws have nothing to do with morality. We must teach this.

It’s like these activist judges are scared the kids might grow up and change their minds; since they can choose to cut anything they want off later on when of age to make these types of decisions.

Democrats want to rule the world. We have a choice: rule, or be ruled.

Ah, yes, the dishonorable Mr. Breyer;

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5355754-appeals-panel-scrutinizes-judges-block-on-trump-national-guard-deployment/

Why should Trump show respect to those that continually attack him. How ignorant do you have to be to even consider that Governor Brylcreem would give permission?

Sixty-two years ago? Feels bad. I'm calling in sick today.