A Rankin County woman's federal lawsuit against former MHP trooper Ivana Williams was dismissed with prejudice today.
A "Jane Doe" charged Williams, Brad McLendon, and other "Does" with disclosure of intimate images under 15 U.S.C. Section 6851(b), intentional infliction of emotional distress. invasion of privacy, defamation, negligent infliction of emotional distress, civil battery, civil assault, negligence per se - invasion of privacy, civil conspiracy, gross negligence, and fraudulent concealment in a lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in March.The plaintiff alleged the defendant took advantage of her sexually when she got too drunk at the defendant's home and videotaped the encounter. She claimed the former trooper shared the video with others, including McLendon. McLendon was a trooper as well. However, no video or evidence of a video ever surfaced. Earlier post covering complaint.
U.S. District Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III dismissed the lawsuit today. The agreed order of dismissal states:
CAME ON THIS DAY, Jane Doe, Plaintiff, and Defendants Brad McLendon and Ivanna Williams, and jointly submit this Final Judgment of Dismissal with Prejudice in the above-styled cause of action, and it being stipulated and made known to the Court that the parties agree that the Complaint filed by Jane Doe and the Counterclaim filed by Defendant Williams, and any potential claims of McLendon, should be dismissed with prejudice and consent to the entry of this Judgment, having maturely considered same and being fully advised in the premises, it is well-taken and should be sustained.
Williams is still fighting her termination from the MHP in federal court.
30 comments:
Word on the “street” is DPS tried to settle with Williams and her counsel sad Pound Sand.
Talk about dangerous precedents...
12:27 pm offered to settle... WHO is HER attny ?
Dewey, Cheatem, and Howe, LLP
Word on the "street" is she wanted her job back and DPS told her attorney to pound sand.
Her attorney is cottonmouth the poster at 12:27
Somebody please translate the judge talk and explain why the action was dismissed.
Why is E31 still employed, and Williams isn't?
Can't wait till her amended complaint is filed. Going to be some big names exposed along with the corruption going on at DPS. Get your popcorn ready.
Ever heard of quid pro qou sexual harrassment? Some people should be worried.
All the texts and communications she has kept will be really interesting. As they say deny deny deny, but electronic communications do not lie!
“ However, no video or evidence of a video ever surfaced” you know damn well every cop in RC has seen the video. Kingfish I know you spoken to the victim as well. Stop bullshitting. You know the video exist. So does Therese Apel. Bad writing.
12:27 Thanks -- maybe they are smarter than they sound- well wait, who cares.
If word on the street about offering a substantial settlement to Ivana is true, DPS aleady knows they have exposure risk. Question is how much more are they willing to add to keep this swept under the rug as the worst is yet to come? This will be the biggest scandal in the history of the state. Mark my word!!
How about the guy they hired at Capitol Police who is giglio for the swat team? Why was he hired in a law enforcement capacity by Sean Tindell and Keith Davis after they were made aware of the fact? Is this the good ole boy system at work?
If you want to see the incompetence and waste of taxpayer resources go to the employee appeals board and look at all the settlements and reversals involving this administration. I don't think any of Tindells head hunting adventures have worked out for him yet. There will be more in the next couple months as well, so stay tuned.
Tindell likes to settle matters and sweep them under the rug with NDAs to avoid bad PR. It is all about image. Dig deeper and you will find the actual outcomes of these cases.
Sounds like Williams paid the chick she taped....settlement.
Try again. Settlement agreements are public record in Mississippi.
Hutson and Lott are not going to win their appeals. Neither is Cochran. Now they did get reversed after firing that trooper up in N. Mississippi who deserved it. Remember him? The Board reversed it and was wrong to do so. As for the first two troopers and defendant in question, if they are sending nude pics of each other or requesting and receiving, they are toast. Show me a company where that would be allowed
Well find the outcomes of the cases before posting then. Numerous have been "resolved." Find the public records of the settlements and report back what they say. There are others as well you have not mentioned and more pending.
Williams didn't pay anyone. The chick knew it was bogus from the get go and filed bankruptcy to protect herself from getting hammered from the counterclaim.
I figured from the start that this was a consensual act between 2 drunk adults. I honestly feel sorry for Ivana in the sense that she’s been called a rapist and she’s truly not. However, her firing from MHP has nothing to do with Jane Doe. It has to do with her actions while on the job. It’s like she can’t understand that part. While she is correct that many men have done similar things without repercussions, she refuses to accept responsibility for her own actions and has now wasted an entire year blaming others for those actions, instead of working towards a new career and positive outcome for her children. The begging for money online while being able-bodied and on government assistance is shameful.
Kingfish: Which trooper in North Mississippi was fired with a resulting overturning of that action? If you're talking about E-31, you're lying.
What about sharing the video that she claims doesn't exist, but she sent it to her boyfriend, and it somehow got sent all over--is that not considered sharing porn, since the other girl in it didn't want it sent out?
She was really low to accuse her kid of accessing adult sites on her state phone. If the kid was old enough to be looking it up, then he was old enough to know not to use a state phone to do it with. That was just another of her lies, and blaming her kid was disgusting.
Could there be anyone more annoying.
*sent it to her MARRIED boyfriend whose WIFE found the video - the video that doesn’t exist. Fixed it for ya.
I agree. Throwing her kid under the bus was unforgivable.
King- Fox News allowed Titus and Charles Payne to send nudes. No termination.
There is no law against 'sharing porn', 10:19, when only adults are involved.
It doesn’t matter that there isn’t an “anti-porn-sharing” law. Laws and policies are two different things, Ivana. Breaking either of those can result in termination of employment in most any line of work. You got fired for breaking a policy, not a law. How the hell were you a cop but can’t understand that very basic notion?
Post a Comment