Friday, August 2, 2013

INTIMIDATION!

David Breland reports in the Hattiesburg Americanthere was possible intimidation of the jury in Ware v. Dupree:

"A member of the jury in Ware v. DuPree has come forward with their version of the events that transpired in the jury deliberation room Tuesday evening. (Their?)

The biggest question is: why did a juror or jurors change their vote after the jury notified Judge Coleman of a 9-3 verdict giving Dave Ware the most legal votes in the June 4 general election? (Their?)

According to a note sent to Judge Coleman during deliberations and from the juror’s interview, a member of the jury was intimidated about revealing their decision in public. (Their?)

“I know they felt intimidated,” the juror said. “When he [Judge Coleman] polled us in open court, we all were upset. He should have never done that.”

The juror stated the largest topic of discussion in deliberations was the illegal absentee ballots, a major part of Ware’s legal case.

“We mostly discussed the ballots and applications. They were there and that was proof, you can’t deny it,” the juror said.

Those who dissented with a verdict in favor of Ware were afraid of tossing out legal ballots along with illegal ballots, the juror said.

“The ones that voted against Mr. Ware were concerned that the good ballots were thrown out. They were adamant about that,” the juror said. “We talked about the [Mississippi] Supreme Court case the lawyers brought up that said the legal ballots have to be thrown out with the illegal ones. We asked for that case to read more about it, but they wouldn’t give us that.”..." Rest of article"

Damn right Coleman should have never done that. Polling jurors in public is nothing less than a corruption of the judicial system. Turns out Enoch Sanders was right about Judge Coleman. This sorry excuse of a judge actually polled the jurors in an open courtroom. One can just imagine the outrage if a jury in 1960s voted to convict Beckwith and then changed their votes if asked how they voted in an open courtroom in front of a bunch of angry klukkers? It would have been wrong then and its wrong now. I bet you would see Fairly and the NAACP marching if he was alive at that time. Won't see the NAACP protesting this type of intimidation, will you? It is the position of this website that the secret vote of a jury is just as important as the secret vote that takes place in the voting booths on election day. It is true there are unanimous votes and thus everyone knows how each juror votes is known. However, the judge should never ask the jurors in public how they vote.

Note: I may not like the rule but as a commentor pointed out, here is the rule:

If the foreman or the jury panel answers in the affirmative, the judge shall call upon the foreman or any member of the panel to deliver the verdict in writing to the clerk or the court. The court may then examine the verdict and correct it as to matters of form. The clerk or the court shall then read the verdict in open court in the presence of the jury. The court shall inquire if either party desires to poll the jury, or the court may on its own motion poll the jury. If neither party nor the court desires to poll the jury, the verdict shall be ordered filed and entered of record and the jurors discharged from the cause, unless a bifurcated hearing is necessary. If the court, on its own motion, or on motion of either party, polls the jury, each juror shall be asked by the court if the verdict rendered is that juror's verdict. In a criminal case where the verdict is unanimous and in a civil case where the required number of jurors have voted in the affirmative for the verdict, the court shall order the verdict filed and entered of record and discharge the jury unless a bifurcated hearing is necessary. If a juror dissents in a criminal case or in a civil case if less than the required number cannot agree the court may: 1) return the jury for further deliberations or 2) declare a mistrial. No motion to poll the jury shall be entertained after the verdict is ordered to be filed and entered of record or the jury is discharged

23 comments:

Anonymous said...

Under Uniform Circuit Court Rule 3.10 the judge is required to poll the jury if either party requests it. The judge can also do it on his own. It's reversible error not to.

courtney said...

Coleman polled the Jury because a) Dupree's team requested and b) it is required by law. McLarty v. State, 842 So.2d 590 (Miss.App. 2003).

Kingfish said...

I said public.

Anonymous said...

Rule 3.10 describes polling in open court. As does the case law, which says that the purpose of polling is for the jury members to assent to the verdict in OPEN COURT. This is black letter law, which I know may not sway "the position of this website." But fortunately, we are a nation of laws, not of blogs.

Anonymous said...

It has to be in open court, which by definition is public.

You can bash the rule, but the judge was just doing what the law required him to do. It's not the judge's fault you don't like the rule.

Kingfish said...

Well thank you for the legal education. Happy is the man who blesseth his chastisement. A law that needs to be changed then because yes, as someone just commented, it smacks of Mafia-style justice.

If there is another trial, I'd ask for a different venue.

Anonymous said...

Juries are polled in public all the time. That the media (and bloggers) are making a big deal of a routine procedure shows ignorance of the judicial system that is frankly embarrassing. Sit in a court room on any given day and you will see the jury polled. And, "mafia-style justice," really? Just a tad dramatic.

Anonymous said...

Appreciate your frustration, KF. Intimidation seemed to be 100% relative to this case yet the law allows for the public polling. Catch-22. Your example of the 1960s jury is a very good example.

Kingfish said...

I've sat in quite a few courtrooms. And hearings too. Even some trials.

Anonymous said...

I'm guessing there won't be another trial.

Anonymous said...

We need to carve out an exception for verdicts related to election contests, for the same reason we have secret ballots when we vote. An in camera poll by the judge should be sufficient to protect the litigants.

Polling is necessary because, unfortunately, many juries are comprised of people who are complete idiots. I have seen multiple instances of juries that announced a verdict in favor of one party who, when polled, actually voted 7-5 for the party. I have also seen juries say they were deadlocked (in civil cases) at 11-1. If you are one of the brilliant people who comment on this blog about the horrible state of our justice system, in Hinds County and elsewhere, and you have ever gotten out of jury duty, know that you are the primary reason for our failing judicial system.

None of this appears to have been the cause of the problems in Hattiesburg. The jury understood, exactly, what the different vote counts meant (Dupree's attorneys explained on closing that they "only needed 4 of you"). The ultimate verdict in Hattiesburg was the result of pure intimidation.

I suspect that the next 100 years of this country's existence will find whites profoundly and sincerely grateful for the work of LBJ, MLK and the protections of civil rights law and, ironically, will find people like Precious Martin arguing against civil rights legislation. My advice to the Republican party would be to strengthen voter protection laws, while they still can, instead of weakening them.

Anonymous said...

I bet this Hattiesburg nightmare is just the tip of the iceberg. The is no doubt that the election process has been high jacked by the same cast of characters, charlatans, buffoons and thugs across the entire state of Mississippi...Jim Crow my foot! We now have black crow! Were is the Justice Department?

Anonymous said...

11:26, whites are not protected by federal law and never will be.1:40 the justice department wrote the handbook the thugs use to steal the elections.

Anonymous said...

Kingfish, get to WDAM and see this

http://www.wdam.com/story/23021958/jury-told-judge-in-hattiesburg-election-trial-someone-is-afraid-of-retaliation

Copy of note showing 9-3 verdict and note saying "Someone is afraid of retaliation."

Anonymous said...

http://www.wdam.com/story/23032187/hattiesburg-election-trial-witness-fears-for-her-life

Witness is fearful for her life following testimony. Good reason to fear retaliation.

Anonymous said...

Best just just take this one down and start over. Take a mulligan

Pugnacious said...

From the Urban Dictionary.

An old jazzer term for a marijuana cigarette or joint.


Don't bogart that mulligan, my friend

Anonymous said...

http://www.msnewsnow.com/story/23032187/hattiesburg-election-trial-witness-fears-for-her-life

this is about a witness, not a juror.

Pugnacious said...

Mississippi is the only state that does NOT permit some form of juror's question at trial. Texas allows questions in civil trials, but not criminal ones.

The answer to "complete idiots" in the jury box is make it possible that a Star Juror can save the day for an innocent defendant before he/she becomes a victim of malicious prosecution, judicial misconduct and an incompetent public defender. The sad cases of Julian Mingo, Mary Sue Shields and Ronnie Mitchener in the 16th Mississippi Judicial court being the prime examples.

Anonymous said...

This case isn't over. Over the next 2 weeks there will be more stories which will expose the truth regarding the Dupree mafia and its attempts to taint this election through ballot tampering and witness intimidation.

Anonymous said...

All you early commentators - check the facts here.

The judge polled the jury - asked each juror individually "if they agreed this was the jury's verdit?" Each juror individually stated that the 9-3 Ware is the Mayor was the jury's verdit.

That is what is required by the Rule. What was error here was the judge went back and asked each juror how they voted - Dupree or Ware. That is not according to the rule.

That question violated the secrecy of the jury's deliberations.

There is a difference between the "polling of the jury" and asking each juror how they voted individually.

inhattiesburg,wereyou said...

Rule 3.10 states, in part: "If the court, either on its on motion or on motion of either party, polls the jury, each juror shall be asked by the court IF THE VERDICT RENDERED IS THAT JUROR'S VERDICT".

In the subject instance, the judge asked that question as to the 9-3 verdict rendered. Each juror answered in the affirmative.

What the judge did in this case appears to have crossed this line, when he went back and asked each juror - "you misunderstood my question. How did you vote? Dupree or Ware?"

That is a different polling than is done in civil cases. And that may well be reversible error.

Anonymous said...

10:50, that article was about witness intimidation. The jury was also intimidated. In fact the note from the jury after being sent back following the 9-3 / 8-4 fiasco that they would report to the judge in private but not in open court because one juror was afraid to say in open public. The judge could have called each juror individually into chambers, with attorneys present, and asked them for their vote after receiving such a notice from the jury. But he didn't.

If the jury voted 9-3, and each juror reported that the 9-3, Ware is the Mayor verdict was the correct jury verdict, what happened to the secret vote that occurs in the jury room when the Judge asked each juror what their individual vote was? Why not let them deliberate in public, and vote in public. There is a reason for the secret deliberations of a jury, and this "polling" threw it in the wind.


Recent Comments

Search Jackson Jambalaya

Subscribe to JJ's Youtube channel

Archives

Trollfest '09

Trollfest '07 was such a success that Jackson Jambalaya will once again host Trollfest '09. Catch this great event which will leave NE Jackson & Fondren in flames. Othor Cain and his band, The Black Power Structure headline the night while Sonjay Poontang returns for an encore performance. Former Frank Melton bodyguard Marcus Wright makes his premier appearance at Trollfest singing "I'm a Sweet Transvestite" from "The Rocky Horror Picture Show." Kamikaze will sing his new hit, “How I sold out to da Man.” Robbie Bell again performs: “Mamas, don't let your babies grow up to be Bells” and “Any friend of Ed Peters is a friend of mine”. After the show, Ms. Bell will autograph copies of her mug shot photos. In a salute to “Dancing with the Stars”, Ms. Bell and Hinds County District Attorney Robert Smith will dance the Wango Tango.

Wrestling returns, except this time it will be a Battle Royal with Othor Cain, Ben Allen, Kim Wade, Haley Fisackerly, Alan Lange, and “Big Cat” Donna Ladd all in the ring at the same time. The Battle Royal will be in a steel cage, no time limit, no referee, and the losers must leave town. Marshand Crisler will be the honorary referee (as it gives him a title without actually having to do anything).


Meet KIM Waaaaaade at the Entergy Tent. For five pesos, Kim will sell you a chance to win a deed to a crack house on Ridgeway Street stuffed in the Howard Industries pinata. Don't worry if the pinata is beaten to shreds, as Mr. Wade has Jose, Emmanuel, and Carlos, all illegal immigrants, available as replacements for the it. Upon leaving the Entergy tent, fig leaves will be available in case Entergy literally takes everything you have as part of its Trollfest ticket price adjustment charge.

Donna Ladd of The Jackson Free Press will give several classes on learning how to write. Smearing, writing without factchecking, and reporting only one side of a story will be covered. A donation to pay their taxes will be accepted and she will be signing copies of their former federal tax liens. Ms. Ladd will give a dramatic reading of her two award-winning essays (They received The Jackson Free Press "Best Of" awards.) "Why everything is always about me" and "Why I cover murders better than anyone else in Jackson".

In the spirit of helping those who are less fortunate, Trollfest '09 adopts a cause for which a portion of the proceeds and donations will be donated: Keeping Frank Melton in his home. The “Keep Frank Melton From Being Homeless” booth will sell chances for five dollars to pin the tail on the jackass. John Reeves has graciously volunteered to be the jackass for this honorable excursion into saving Frank's ass. What's an ass between two friends after all? If Mr. Reeves is unable to um, perform, Speaker Billy McCoy has also volunteered as when the word “jackass” was mentioned he immediately ran as fast as he could to sign up.


In order to help clean up the legal profession, Adam Kilgore of the Mississippi Bar will be giving away free, round-trip plane tickets to the North Pole where they keep their bar complaint forms (which are NOT available online). If you don't want to go to the North Pole, you can enjoy Brant Brantley's (of the Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance) free guided tours of the quicksand field over by High Street where all complaints against judges disappear. If for some reason you are unable to control yourself, never fear; Judge Houston Patton will operate his jail where no lawyers are needed or allowed as you just sit there for minutes... hours.... months...years until he decides he is tired of you sitting in his jail. Do not think Judge Patton is a bad judge however as he plans to serve free Mad Dog 20/20 to all inmates.

Trollfest '09 is a pet-friendly event as well. Feel free to bring your dog with you and do not worry if your pet gets hungry, as employees of the Jackson Zoo will be on hand to provide some of their animals as food when it gets to be feeding time for your little loved one.

Relax at the Fox News Tent. Since there are only three blonde reporters in Jackson (being blonde is a requirement for working at Fox News), Megan and Kathryn from WAPT and Wendy from WLBT will be on loan to Fox. To gain admittance to the VIP section, bring either your Republican Party ID card or a Rebel Flag. Bringing both and a torn-up Obama yard sign will entitle you to free drinks served by Megan, Wendy, and Kathryn. Get your tickets now. Since this is an event for trolls, no ID is required. Just bring the hate. Bring the family, Trollfest '09 is for EVERYONE!!!

This is definitely a Beaver production.


Note: Security provided by INS.

Trollfest '07

Jackson Jambalaya is the home of Trollfest '07. Catch this great event which promises to leave NE Jackson & Fondren in flames. Sonjay Poontang and his band headline the night with a special steel cage, no time limit "loser must leave town" bout between Alan Lange and "Big Cat"Donna Ladd following afterwards. Kamikaze will perform his new song F*** Bush, he's still a _____. Did I mention there was no referee? Dr. Heddy Matthias and Lori Gregory will face off in the undercard dueling with dangling participles and other um, devices. Robbie Bell will perform Her two latest songs: My Best Friends are in the Media and Mama's, Don't Let Your Babies Grow up to be George Bell. Sid Salter of The Clarion-Ledger will host "Pin the Tail on the Trial Lawyer", sponsored by State Farm.

There will be a hugging booth where in exchange for your young son, Frank Melton will give you a loooong hug. Trollfest will have a dunking booth where Muhammed the terrorist will curse you to Allah as you try to hit a target that will drop him into a vat of pig grease. However, in the true spirit of Separate But Equal, Don Imus and someone from NE Jackson will also sit in the dunking booth for an equal amount of time. Tom Head will give a reading for two hours on why he can't figure out who the hell he is. Cliff Cargill will give lessons with his .80 caliber desert eagle, using Frank Melton photos as targets. Tackleberry will be on hand for an autograph session. KIM Waaaaaade will be passing out free titles and deeds to crackhouses formerly owned by The Wood Street Players.

If you get tired come relax at the Fox News Tent. To gain admittance to the VIP section, bring either your Republican Party ID card or a Rebel Flag. Bringing both will entitle you to free drinks.Get your tickets now. Since this is an event for trolls, no ID is required, just bring the hate. Bring the family, Trollfest '07 is for EVERYONE!!!

This is definitely a Beaver production.

Note: Security provided by INS
.