Jackson Mayor John Horhn issued the following statement.
Mayor John Horhn and the City of Jackson today expressed disappointment following the Mississippi Legislature’s passage of legislation creating a Jackson Water Authority, noting that the final bill does not give Jackson a majority-appointed governing board over assets the City owns and for which it continues to bear substantial financial risk. The City appreciates the work that went into reaching this point, but believes governance and responsibility should be aligned.
The final legislation still leaves important questions unanswered about accountability, debt service, and long-term management of the system. The City remains concerned that if the Authority and the Mayor or City Council do not agree, the bill does not clearly establish how major decisions will be made or who will bear responsibility if the Authority cannot generate enough revenue to meet its obligations.
The legislation does include provisions for independent rate studies every two years, a bill dispute process, and a structure for future rate action, but serious concerns remain about whether those provisions fully address the ongoing issues of rising rates, low collection of past-due bills, and the Authority’s ability to sustain operations without creating new burdens for Jackson residents.
The City also remains concerned that municipal customers such as Byram and Ridgeland would have representation on the board while not carrying the same responsibility for the debt and financial risks tied to the system. That imbalance is a central reason the City had urged a board structure that gave Jackson a majority role in appointing members.
While others have celebrated the defeat of a Jackson-controlled water authority, the City’s focus remains on finding real answers for governance, service, collections, and debt responsibility.
“Jackson should not be asked to carry the greatest risk without having the authority to govern the assets it owns,” Mayor Horhn said. “We will continue working with our city leaders, state and federal officials, and other partners toward a solution that is fair, workable, and centered on accountability. Jackson should be able to govern its own resources.”
Kingfish note: Don't think the legislature didn't notice the Mayor and City Council's strong opposition to a rate increase or the bitching about cutoffs.
20 comments:
Mayor said he will work with officials toward a solution that is fair! Why would officials not present a fair solution? Probably it’s more than a solution to solving water problems it’s about who controls the contracts and I wanna be solely in charge. Never ending money and power grab.
They don't know how to govern assets.
Mayor still fussing about raise.
Free the water!
Name one major decision that Mayor Horhn has made where Mayor Lumumba would not have made the same decision. Horhn billed himself as different than his incompetent predecessors but is says and does the same things.
Somebody needs to inform the Mayor what an asset is because the Jackson water system isn't a real asset for at least 20 more years and that's even if things go well.
Sorry City was given a chance and fumbled badly, No Boil water alerts in months (they were weekly under Jackson management)
The City gotsta make all the payments to own the assets, and the only way to do that is to keep the water system's assets properly maintained and operational to generate the revenues to make the bond payments.
Jackson's poor track record on these items is why we are where we are.
State to Jackson: You can't manage a water system. Jackson: Hold my beer
@3:42 PM Did you not see the interview Hohrn gave to WLBT in April '24? Horn has exactly the same political ideology as Chokwe. Jackson will continue to die while the suburbs flourish.
You guys voted Lumumba back in office. It just took a minute for him to appear. Good luck with all of that.
Am I wrong in my understanding that the water authority would take over the $120 million debt, so that it would no longer by the city's responsibility?
Neither the city council nor the mayor will be able to do the usual contract $teering to their friend$ and relative$. But they won't have to frequently wash that grease off their hands. So sad.
New mayor, same as old mayor but with a different hairdo.
It's all about whitey telling us what to do. That's what the COJ doesn't like. Well, when you can't do something, telling you what to do is what happens.
>That imbalance is a central reason the City had urged a board structure that gave Jackson a majority role in appointing members.
Get fucked Chokwe "John Horhn" Lumumba III. Signed a Ridgelandian.
"The City appreciates the work that went into reaching this point, but believes governance and responsibility should be aligned."
Ahem...cough, cough...Governance and responsibility have been aligned for the past 50 years. The Lumumba regime enjoyed eight years of Governance and Responsibility.
Is the Honorable current Mayor of Jackson recommending more 'alignment' of the same?
Exactly
>The final legislation still leaves important questions unanswered about accountability, debt service, and long-term management of the system. The City remains concerned that if the Authority and the Mayor or City Council do not agree, the bill does not clearly establish how major decisions will be made or who will bear responsibility if the Authority cannot generate enough revenue to meet its obligations.
Is he actually this stupid or is he pretending? The answer of course is it lies with the Authority.
Sorry Mayor, the legislature gave you more than the city should have gotten. Its not a question of what "you" and the council think is 'fair' for yall, its what is fair for the users and ratepayers of the system.
Taking one of the Governor's appointments and requiring that he consult with you prior to making that appointment was a showing of weak knees on the part of Rep Yates - who after all her efforts to do good for Jackson finally threw in the towel in order to satisfy your excessive demands.
Frankly, you ought to be happy with what came out of the legislature - it took this elephant off your table and gave it to someone else to manage. Thankfully so because it appears you are having trouble managing those problems that remain on your desk - following the disaster that Chockwe left you.
Post a Comment