Jackson Jambalaya

Would not be the list bit surprised to learn Maher, Maddow and Daily are all charter members of NAMBLA.

Daily? LMFAO

Sorry. Stewart. He goes by Daily at the NAMBLA meetings........

I thought it was well done, throwing scarcasm at the absurd notion that Joe Paterno and Penn St ,even Penn St rioters acted within the bounds of reasonable behavior.
....even by the harshest (lucifer) standards.

Now we learn that Penn State was being paid thousands (by Sandusky's group) to host sleepovers years after Sandusky had 'decided to spend more time with his family'.

11:35am,2:54 pm...WTF? Did you not "get" from the humor that Jon Stewart( Daily is for every day as in daily newspaper, geniuses) is appalled?
I may not agree with the political positions of Maddow,Maher and Stewart but to suggest they are members of NAMBLA is going too far. Since there have been Republican elected officials who resigned over inappropriate conduct with young people and since you don't know how Sandusky voted , you have alot of nerve to try to politicize a very serious issue. This is NOT a partisan issue.

You both really crossed the line. And, I have to wonder how you both know about NAMBLA. I used to put these monsters in jail, but the average person isn't familiar with that group. How do you two know about it? Spending alot of time on porn sites?

Savage mentions NAMBLA quite a bit on his show.

KF, I hope Savage mentions it in connection with this scandal. Otherwise,being obsessed with NAMBLA enough to mention it " quite a bit" is nearly as creepy as being a member of NAMBLA.

Nevertheless, 11:35am and 2:54pm revealed some seriously warped thought patterns with their posts. At minimum, they are unable to recognize boundaries.

I thought Stewart did a decent job ridiculing Sandusky's phone in to ESPN.

I may have it wrong, but didn't Pelosi march in a NAMBLA sponsored parade in her home state three or four years ago?

Frankly I thought every adult who minimally stays current on national events and news had heard of that disgusting group and its advocacy for sex between adults and children. The real dunce in this conversation is the fellow at 7:39 and 11:33. Those are the posts that seem to indicate an 'obsession'. Otherwise, I've seen no obsession on this board or in Savage's programs.

Yeah, no surprise that you have it wrong, Shadowfax.

As I'm the " fellow" at 7:39 and 11:33 , I admit an obsession as it was my job to protect children from perverts and put the perverts a**es in jail. I've seen children torn apart literally and psychologically by pedophiles. And, misinformation jerks made my job of protecting children harder at every turn.

So , yeah, I get a little incensed when some jerks try to politicize child abuse and see it as an opportunity to demonize the other party or further some issue. A pedophile is still out there thanks to some uninformed political jerks making it about freedom of religion and government interferring in the family without bothering to EVER get the facts.

Suggesting that Pelosi, Maher, Stewart,Maddow are NAMBLA members is not just an effort to politicize an issue of this importance but is warped thinking. Not only that, you misdirect public attention away from an opportunity to learn more about protecting their children.

You apparently missed, in your effort to be " informed", that pedophiles wear the sheep's clothing of Republicans,Democrats,media celebrities,doctors,lawyers,preachers, et.al. They even blog.

And, yeah, I'm suspicious of those who slander others without one whit of evidence for political purpose . I'm more suspicious still when the reaction to two humorous clips that are clearly about how outrageously awful Sandusky and the Penn State administration are, result immediately in calling Stewart and other liberals members of NAMBLA . Do you want the public to believe that only liberals are pedophiles? That'd be great for pedophiles. They could just hide in conservative causes.

A pedophile or rapist has warped thought patterns that aren't JUST warped about children.

So when I read warped thinking, it's a red flag that causes me to wonder about other ways that person's thinking is warped.

I'm sorry, 7:39, 11:33 and 10:23 - you are the one that "politicized" this set of comments. And you are the one that "partisaned politiced" it as well.

Suggesting that Maher, Maddow and Stewart may be 'anything' has nothing to do with "politicizing" the issue. Maddow is of course a 'commentator' with a very obvious tilt, while Maher and Stewart are for lack of a better word - comedians.

But to folks like you making a comment about their leanings is "politicizing"??? Please tell me how.

And while you are at it, please note that you brought in the Dem/Rep issue. Seems to me that you have a "political" problem. Methinks thou protests too much.

4:07 You've GOT to be kidding?

You REALLY can't see that linking Pelosi,Maher, Maddow, and Stewart to NAMBLA isn't politicizing? How about if I had said Limbaugh,Beck, Hannity, and Norquist were members of NAMBLA? DUH! It's not like the politics of all of the above are unknown.

So, KF posts great clips which use humor to express outrage over the Penn State scandal and Shadow and his creepy cohorts use it as an opportunity to bash those they find liberal and worse, do so by suggesting the named liberals are all pedophiles or in Pelosi's case , supporter of pedophiles.

I react pointing out there's no room for partisanship when it comes to child abuse and I'm politicizing? You have got to be kidding!!!!

I have a problem with a^^holes whatever their party who make EVERY F'ing thing about politics.