Sunday, December 2, 2012

Supreme Court allows citizens to videotape the police.

Recording a police officer with a cellphone became easier after the Supreme Court let stand a 2011 Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that affirmed the right of citizens to record police officers performing their duties in public. (No. 12-318) The Court denied certiori to an appeal by the State of Illinois on November 26.* The Seventh Circuit decision overturned a fifty-year old Illinois statute making it a crime to record “all or any part of any conversation” without the consent of all parties. The ACLU filed suit after it announced it was going to start recording police officers while in the performance of their duties.


The law enhanced the offense from a class 4 to a class 1 felony if a police officer was recorded. The increased penalties meant one could earn a prison term of fifteen years or less upon conviction. The law applied only to audio recording. Video taping was allowed as long as no sound was recorded. An impossibility if one is recording with a standard smartphone or cheap video camera. The Seventh Circuit framed the issue as a First Amendment question:

"The question here is whether the First Amendment prevents Illinois prosecutors from enforcing the eavesdropping statute against people who openly record police officers performing their official duties in public."

The District Court ruled the First Amendment did not apply to the law. However, the Seventh Circuit reversed the decision and ordered the district court

"to allow the amended complaint and enter a preliminary injunction blocking enforcement of the eavesdropping statute as applied to audio recording of the kind alleged here. The Illinois eavesdropping statute restricts a medium of expression commonly used for the preservation and communication of information and ideas, thus triggering First Amendment scrutiny. Illinois has criminalized the nonconsensual recording of most any oral communication, including recordings of public officials doing the public’s business in public and regardless of whether the recording is open or surreptitious."

The Court said the law was so broadly written, recording public meetings such as city councils or school boards was made illegal. Thus the freedom of the press is implicated, hence the First Amendment issue:

"Defending the broad sweep of this statute, the State’s Attorney relies on the government’s interest in protecting conversational privacy, but that interest is not implicated when police officers are performing their duties in public places and engaging in public communications audible to persons who witness the events. ...... it likely violates the First Amendment’s free speech and free-press guarantees"


The Seventh Circuit made it clear the law would have stood if it applied to private conversations. However, the law covered all public conversations and statements. The statute could apply to most news broadcasts if someone filed a complaint. Just to make sure Illinois got the point about the First Amendment, the opinion declared:

"Audio and audiovisual recording are communication technologies, and as such, they enable speech. Criminalizing all non-consensual audio recording necessarily limits the information that might later be published or broadcast— whether to the general public or to a single family member or friend— and thus burdens First Amendment rights... Audio recording is entitled to First Amendment protection."

However, the jurisprudence protecting the right of citizens to videotape the police in public do not stop in the Seventh Circuit. The First Circuit Court of Appeals also ruled against the police in 2011 in Glik v. City of Boston.** Attorney Simon Glik recorded several police officers arresting a suspect with his cellphone (More details of the incident are provided on p. 3 of the opinion posted below.). The police ordered him to stop recording the arrest. The police arrested Mr. Glik for allegedly violating the state's wiretap statutes. Mr. Glik filed a Section 1983 suit against the police officers and the city, alleging they violated his constitutional rights after an internal affairs complaint yielded no results. The First Circuit ruled his First Amendment rights were violated as he was arrested "without probable cause". Indeed the First Circuit asked

"is there a constitutionally protected right to videotape police carrying out their duties in public?"

The court answered YES:

"Basic First Amendment principles, along with case law from this and other circuits, answer that question unambiguously in the affirmative. It is firmly established that the First Amendment's aegis extends further than the text's proscription on laws "abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press," and encompasses a range of conduct related to the gathering and dissemination of information."

The court also said it made no difference if the person making the recording was a journalist or a citizen:

"The First Amendment right to gather news is, as the Court has often noted, not one that inures solely to the benefit of the news media; rather, the public's right of access to information is coextensive with that of the press.."

Moreover, changes in technology and society have made the lines between private citizen and journalist exceedingly difficult to draw. The proliferation of electronic devices with video-recording capability means that many of our images of current events come from bystanders with a ready cell phone or digital camera rather than a traditional film crew, and news stories are now just as likely to be broken by a blogger at her computer as a reporter at a major newspaper. Such developments make clear why the news-gathering protections of the First Amendment cannot turn on professional credentials or status
."

Given two circuits have ruled against the police and the Supreme Court let stand one of those rulings, it is going to be harder for the police to prosecute citizens who use their cellphones to record them in public. Wiretapping and privacy laws still apply to private conversations and communications. However, the police are going to find it tougher to arrest someone for "disorderly conduct" when an officer tells someone to turn off his cellphone camera just because he doesn't like it.

*ACLU v. Anita Alvarez, No. 11-286 in Pacer. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.
No. 10 C 5235—Suzanne B. Conlon, Judge.

**Glick v. City of Boston No. 10-1764 in Pacer. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS.



4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Can't wait to see what the comments will be on this subject! Ha!

KaptKangaroo said...

Your last few paragraphs were the honey pot! Score one for the citizen journalists!

Anonymous said...

I don't know that this is true.

Given two circuits have ruled against the police and the Supreme Court let stand one of those rulings, it is going to be harder for the police to prosecute citizens who use their cellphones to record them in public. Wiretapping and privacy laws still apply to private conversations and communications. However, the police are going to find it tougher to arrest someone for "disorderly conduct" when an officer tells someone to turn off his cellphone camera just because he doesn't like it.

There are Cell Phone Guns out there and all the Police have to do is claim officer safty. Should be interesting though.

Anonymous said...

As a police officer and administrator, I have no concerns with citizens recording officers in public spaces. If the officer is doing what he is supposed to do (although it may appear ugly to the regular person) then the officer should not fear someone recording their actions. Law Enforcement Officers are the "government intrusion" that Constitution is supposed to protect people from. Officers walk a fine line daily in the performance of their duties. Occasionally they make mistakes and must be dealt with. We strive to limit the mistakes through training and hope that we are given the opportunities to correct the issues without court intervention; however it is still sometimes necessary. On the other hand, it is estimated that 1/10 of 1% of officers are corrupt. These are the ones that we want recorded in public spaces so that we can take immediate actions to dismiss them from their duties. This job is hard enough when you are doing your best to do the right thing. Those officers that choose not to better themselves and play the wild-west cowboy should not be welcomed among the ranks of any department. Members of the public might be wise to also educate themselves as to concerns police officers have so that they simply don't get too close in a high stress situation to cause the officers concern for their personal safety. Otherwise, make sure the batteries are charged.



Recent Comments

Search Jackson Jambalaya

Subscribe to JJ's Youtube channel

Archives

Trollfest '09

Trollfest '07 was such a success that Jackson Jambalaya will once again host Trollfest '09. Catch this great event which will leave NE Jackson & Fondren in flames. Othor Cain and his band, The Black Power Structure headline the night while Sonjay Poontang returns for an encore performance. Former Frank Melton bodyguard Marcus Wright makes his premier appearance at Trollfest singing "I'm a Sweet Transvestite" from "The Rocky Horror Picture Show." Kamikaze will sing his new hit, “How I sold out to da Man.” Robbie Bell again performs: “Mamas, don't let your babies grow up to be Bells” and “Any friend of Ed Peters is a friend of mine”. After the show, Ms. Bell will autograph copies of her mug shot photos. In a salute to “Dancing with the Stars”, Ms. Bell and Hinds County District Attorney Robert Smith will dance the Wango Tango.

Wrestling returns, except this time it will be a Battle Royal with Othor Cain, Ben Allen, Kim Wade, Haley Fisackerly, Alan Lange, and “Big Cat” Donna Ladd all in the ring at the same time. The Battle Royal will be in a steel cage, no time limit, no referee, and the losers must leave town. Marshand Crisler will be the honorary referee (as it gives him a title without actually having to do anything).


Meet KIM Waaaaaade at the Entergy Tent. For five pesos, Kim will sell you a chance to win a deed to a crack house on Ridgeway Street stuffed in the Howard Industries pinata. Don't worry if the pinata is beaten to shreds, as Mr. Wade has Jose, Emmanuel, and Carlos, all illegal immigrants, available as replacements for the it. Upon leaving the Entergy tent, fig leaves will be available in case Entergy literally takes everything you have as part of its Trollfest ticket price adjustment charge.

Donna Ladd of The Jackson Free Press will give several classes on learning how to write. Smearing, writing without factchecking, and reporting only one side of a story will be covered. A donation to pay their taxes will be accepted and she will be signing copies of their former federal tax liens. Ms. Ladd will give a dramatic reading of her two award-winning essays (They received The Jackson Free Press "Best Of" awards.) "Why everything is always about me" and "Why I cover murders better than anyone else in Jackson".

In the spirit of helping those who are less fortunate, Trollfest '09 adopts a cause for which a portion of the proceeds and donations will be donated: Keeping Frank Melton in his home. The “Keep Frank Melton From Being Homeless” booth will sell chances for five dollars to pin the tail on the jackass. John Reeves has graciously volunteered to be the jackass for this honorable excursion into saving Frank's ass. What's an ass between two friends after all? If Mr. Reeves is unable to um, perform, Speaker Billy McCoy has also volunteered as when the word “jackass” was mentioned he immediately ran as fast as he could to sign up.


In order to help clean up the legal profession, Adam Kilgore of the Mississippi Bar will be giving away free, round-trip plane tickets to the North Pole where they keep their bar complaint forms (which are NOT available online). If you don't want to go to the North Pole, you can enjoy Brant Brantley's (of the Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance) free guided tours of the quicksand field over by High Street where all complaints against judges disappear. If for some reason you are unable to control yourself, never fear; Judge Houston Patton will operate his jail where no lawyers are needed or allowed as you just sit there for minutes... hours.... months...years until he decides he is tired of you sitting in his jail. Do not think Judge Patton is a bad judge however as he plans to serve free Mad Dog 20/20 to all inmates.

Trollfest '09 is a pet-friendly event as well. Feel free to bring your dog with you and do not worry if your pet gets hungry, as employees of the Jackson Zoo will be on hand to provide some of their animals as food when it gets to be feeding time for your little loved one.

Relax at the Fox News Tent. Since there are only three blonde reporters in Jackson (being blonde is a requirement for working at Fox News), Megan and Kathryn from WAPT and Wendy from WLBT will be on loan to Fox. To gain admittance to the VIP section, bring either your Republican Party ID card or a Rebel Flag. Bringing both and a torn-up Obama yard sign will entitle you to free drinks served by Megan, Wendy, and Kathryn. Get your tickets now. Since this is an event for trolls, no ID is required. Just bring the hate. Bring the family, Trollfest '09 is for EVERYONE!!!

This is definitely a Beaver production.


Note: Security provided by INS.

Trollfest '07

Jackson Jambalaya is the home of Trollfest '07. Catch this great event which promises to leave NE Jackson & Fondren in flames. Sonjay Poontang and his band headline the night with a special steel cage, no time limit "loser must leave town" bout between Alan Lange and "Big Cat"Donna Ladd following afterwards. Kamikaze will perform his new song F*** Bush, he's still a _____. Did I mention there was no referee? Dr. Heddy Matthias and Lori Gregory will face off in the undercard dueling with dangling participles and other um, devices. Robbie Bell will perform Her two latest songs: My Best Friends are in the Media and Mama's, Don't Let Your Babies Grow up to be George Bell. Sid Salter of The Clarion-Ledger will host "Pin the Tail on the Trial Lawyer", sponsored by State Farm.

There will be a hugging booth where in exchange for your young son, Frank Melton will give you a loooong hug. Trollfest will have a dunking booth where Muhammed the terrorist will curse you to Allah as you try to hit a target that will drop him into a vat of pig grease. However, in the true spirit of Separate But Equal, Don Imus and someone from NE Jackson will also sit in the dunking booth for an equal amount of time. Tom Head will give a reading for two hours on why he can't figure out who the hell he is. Cliff Cargill will give lessons with his .80 caliber desert eagle, using Frank Melton photos as targets. Tackleberry will be on hand for an autograph session. KIM Waaaaaade will be passing out free titles and deeds to crackhouses formerly owned by The Wood Street Players.

If you get tired come relax at the Fox News Tent. To gain admittance to the VIP section, bring either your Republican Party ID card or a Rebel Flag. Bringing both will entitle you to free drinks.Get your tickets now. Since this is an event for trolls, no ID is required, just bring the hate. Bring the family, Trollfest '07 is for EVERYONE!!!

This is definitely a Beaver production.

Note: Security provided by INS
.