Some overpaid EEOC lawyers apparently need to justify their salary. The Washington Post reports:
On January 8, 2014, Complainant filed a formal complaint in which he alleged that the Agency subjected him to discrimination on the basis of race (African American) and in reprisal for prior EEO activity when, starting in the fall of 2013, a coworker (C1) repeatedly wore a cap to work with an insignia of the Gadsden Flag, which depicts a coiled rattlesnake and the phrase “Don’t Tread on Me.”
Complainant stated that he found the cap to be racially offensive to African Americans because the flag was designed by Christopher Gadsden, a “slave trader & owner of slaves.” Complainant also alleged that he complained about the cap to management; however, although management assured him C1 would be told not to wear the cap, C1 continued to come to work wearing the offensive cap. Additionally, Complainant alleged that on September 2, 2013, a coworker took a picture of him on the work room floor without his consent. In a decision dated January 29, 2014, the Agency dismissed Complainant’s complaint on the basis it failed to state a claim . . . .
Complainant maintains that the Gadsden Flag is a “historical indicator of white resentment against blacks stemming largely from the Tea Party.” He notes that the Vice President of the International Association of Black Professional Firefighters cited the Gadsden Flag as the equivalent of the Confederate Battle Flag when he successfully had it removed from a New Haven, Connecticut fire department flagpole.
After a thorough review of the record, it is clear that the Gadsden Flag originated in the Revolutionary War in a non-racial context. Moreover, it is clear that the flag and its slogan have been used to express various non-racial sentiments, such as when it is used in the modern Tea Party political movement, guns rights activism, patriotic displays, and by the military.
However, whatever the historic origins and meaning of the symbol, it also has since been sometimes interpreted to convey racially-tinged messages in some contexts. For example, in June 2014, assailants with connections to white supremacist groups draped the bodies of two murdered police officers with the Gadsden flag during their Las Vegas, Nevada shooting spree. [Footnote: Shooters in Metro ambush that left five dead spoke of white supremacy and a desire to kill police, Las Vegas Review-Journal, June 8, 2014, available online at: http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/las-vegas/shooters-metro-ambush-left-five-dead-spoke-white-supremacy-and-desire-kill-police.] Additionally, in 2014, African-American New Haven firefighters complained about the presence of the Gadsden flag in the workplace on the basis that the symbol was racially insensitive. [Paul Bass, Flag Sparks Fire Department Complaint, New Haven Independent, Feb. 25, 2014, available online at:http://www.newhavenindependent.org/index.php/archives/entry/tea_party_fire_department/.] Certainly, Complainant ascribes racial connotations to the symbol based on observations that it is sometimes displayed in racially-tinged situations.
In light of the ambiguity in the current meaning of this symbol, we find that Complainant’s claim must be investigated to determine the specific context in which C1 displayed the symbol in the workplace. In so finding, we are not prejudging the merits of Complainant’s complaint. Instead, we are precluding a procedural dismissal that would deprive us of evidence that would illuminate the meaning conveyed by C1’s display of the symbol.Rest of article.
Kingfish note: For once, I will say what I really think: F the Feds. It apparently escapes some people that the flag represents a stand against a tyrannical government. Something that a certain crowd representing minorities and protesting against the police claims it stands against as well.
7 comments:
Attacks on the 1st amendment and free speech are becoming more of the norm. The left is trying to take away our Bill of Rights one by one. In 50 years, one will be arrested for speaking out against the central government and its tyranny.
Two words for the EEOC.....pound sand.
Wonder if the complainant could spell Christopher Gadsden?
When did people lose the right to free speech? Also wonder how many black lives matter shirts, caps, stickers were in the work place?
Dylan Roof in South Carolina also wore this hat. Go figure.
A great majority of truck owners who display various Confederate flags in their back windows or on their bumpers have zero understanding or knowledge of the origins of those flags. Confederate images are emblazoned in the middle with beer mugs, deer heads and semi-nude women.
'The South Will Rise Again' and 'Hell No We Won't Fergit' have nothing whatever to do with the struggle endured by The Confederacy at or following its formation.
The EEOC will never learn the 'reason' or 'motive' this man had for wearing his cap. Primarily because the man himself has no idea. He does not know (or care to know) the origin of the symbol or its various related uses.
The EEOC is simply, as always, on a witch hunt.
Do you mean Dylann Roof?
A little over 20 years ago I bought a pickup with a confederate flag tag on the front. I sold it to a man who later sold it to a black man. I recently saw the old pickup, the black man still had it, and the confederate tag was still on the front.
Sometimes people look for something to gripe about.
Post a Comment