Jackson Jambalaya

I'm trying to understand her reasoning for going to trial.

This woman needs to be put away forever.

They just lie.

From WLBT's current story: "WLBT investigative reporting was the first to show you that the 52-year-old is no stranger to the criminal justice system."

Kingfish published the story at 8:32 pm on 11/3/21.

WLBT published their version at 11:07 on 11/3/21.

White is no saint and needs to do time, a lot of it. I bet the reason for trial is there has been a rumor floating around that the wife was fleeing from her husband due to a DV situation and ran out into the intersection, and her council will try to prove it and get a lighter sentence. Due to her history, whether she is right, wrong, wrong place wrong time, she will still get hammered.

Shouldn't the trooper have testified "there was a partially empty bottle..."

Another Green "blessing"

The DV situation probably stemmed from her alcoholism and drunk driving.

Women do not deserve to be held accountable for their actions. What are you people, misogynists?

Who was at fault for the crash?

All the past charges that were dismissed should almost certainly be ruled inadmissible. The prior felony conviction is a closer call.

There should be rulings on these issues prior to the start of the trial, and maybe there are.

@11:17

The intoxicated person is always immediately at fault in a car crash

10:57 the DV situation is the lady who got killed in the crash. The alleged rumor is he was immediately behind her as she was fleeing from him and ran the redlight. I have heard that rumor as well.

@10:07 AM
Nobody at WLBT considers this gossip blog to be “journalism” by any stretch of the imagination.

We metabolize alcohol at the rate of about .02%/hour. If the blood draw was two hours later her BAC would have been approx. 0.20%. That was probably her 24/7 BAC.

and what gossip posts have I made?

12:08: Why are you here?

11:35...How so? Suppose the drunk was driving through the green light and the other driver ran the red light and caused the crash and her death? I am not defending the idiot drunk driver but suppose this wreck was not her fault? As in 0%? Should she go to jail for the rest of her life because of a wreck someone else caused? I would have a hard time sending her to prison for the rest of her life if someone else caused the wreck, drunk or not.

@12:08 PM - Then why does WLBT's ace senior investigative reporter get many of his leads here?

I have lost 2 loved ones to drunk drivers!!! I hope they hang this woman never to hurt anyone again!!! She killed 2 people off her actions, and she should go straight to jail, and ROT IN HELL!!!!!!

This accident happened two years ago! Why do we still have killers that allegedly killed prior to this date roaming the streets of Jackson Ms with no trial date?

The DA needs to do a better job getting killers off the streets so that won’t kill again!

Election promises!!!

@1:21

11:35 here , I was hit by a drunk driver once and the way my attorney explained it to me was when a person dies and there is a drunk driver involved, it is automatically the drunk drivers fault, no exceptions

@ 2:26 - I hope you didn't pay for that attorney's advice. It's the jury's job to determine partial degrees of manner and cause of death in such a circumstance. If it's determined that the primary cause of death is attributable to a crash caused by the deceased having run a red light at a high rate of speed, that's primary. the fact that the defendant was intoxicated is a secondary, contributing factor.....regardless of which of you had a family member yada yada yada.

Whether she goes to jail for multiple DUIs is one thing. Whether she caused the death(s) is another.

Agree she should get life. None of the priors should be admitted in evidence during trial. Not needed to convict and will muddy the waters. But it should be relevant in sentencing.

Dickinson had a personal catch and release program for her.

WAPT reported her BAC was 0.273%.

"Nobody at WLBT considers this gossip blog to be “journalism” by any stretch of the imagination."

Only those people can say what they consider it and I doubt any one of them could speak for "everybody" there, but some of them must read it because I've seen it cited in stories there.

@5:02, if it's determined that the accused did not cause the death, why should she 'go to jail for life'? I understand that your britches get real twisted over drinking and driving, but still....

Meanwhile: "..the way my attorney explained it to me was when a person dies and there is a drunk driver involved, it is automatically the drunk drivers fault, no exceptions".

So, If I'm driving drunk and 45 mph and someone rear-ends me at a high rate of speed, and succumbs to his injuries, it is automatically my fault? You care to post your attorney's name?

@3:42 AM
Drunks see pink elephants and slam on their breaks abruptly. They also randomly pass out behind the wheel. Shouldn’t be hard to convince a jury that it was your fault for the accident while driving intoxicated.

I see drunk drivers as equal to pedophiles who are also unable to control their urges and ruin lives and families. Good luck defending them too!

@12:08 none of the local stations do anything even close to journalism. so called newspapers don't either.

@7:38 - Your comparison with pedophiles notwithstanding, good luck convincing a jury that I saw pink elephants and slammed on the brakes. You do realize you'd need evidence of either.

You'd be eliminated from the jury pool right away and on your way back home.

@8:19 your BAC would prove you were drinking if you rear ended me. If the courts don't ship you off to do your time and you somehow get away with it, rest assured knowing you would have to make the courts come get me. You would see me everyday.

Why don't everyone here just mind there own business they have going on in there lives

Try to pay attention, 1:33. In the example given, the drunk driver was driving along at the speed limit, breaking no law other than drunk driving.

HE was rear-ended which resulted in the death of the rear-ender.

Although the drunk driver is obviously guilty of a DUI, how can he be held responsible for the death of the driver who rear-ended him?