Jackson Jambalaya

"are not limited too"

Brilliant. Ryshonda wants access to that vault!

This will be fum. Are you going to be there to film it?

So the Mayor has to have permission to gain access to town information?

Sounds like a certain realtor is still mad she lost. Don’t blame the winner/current mayor. Blame your apathetic friends.

Any news on the newly hired city clerk who was hired, quit her other job, then was fired by the newly appointed mayor and her previous employer had already hired someone to fill her job vacancy? Seems like a pretty bad situation.

That “certain Realtor” wouldn’t have anything to do with the Mayor’s access to information. That “certain Realtor” is no longer on the board.

@130p lol did you not watch the March 5 meeting the mayor has access, she has not set up her accounts on purpose so she can say she doesn’t. Anyway the access she wants is the other staffs personal passwords. Would you give her your. What does her opponent have to do with this, I think nothing she has remained quiet through all of this, go fish for something else

Hmm

@3:14 have you kept up with what has been posted? The board hired a lady for the clerk position. The mayor vetoed everything from that board meeting including the hiring of another person. The board had a Saturday board meeting and they chose to override each veto EXCEPT the hiring of this lady. So how exactly is that the mayors fault? The other person was hired. The board has the power not the mayor.
@4:10 “certain realtor” Megan Hall has nothing to do with access granted, however, she likes to put her twist on everything and stay in the aldermens ear with her opinion therefore influencing them.

Why did HBG Academy close it’s doors in January? Was is because duties related to Ryshonda’s job as mayor or something else? Left with no explanation or childcare. JJ maybe you can answer this.

No use to call this meeting if the mayor is going to harass the employees. Maybe she will leave the new ones along. Everything will be in such a mess it will take a special person to straighten everything out. The mayor and the chief of Police has just about ruined this town. can't wait to see what drama happens at this meeting.

@6:14 know your facts... the ALDERMAN called the meeting.
Alone vs Along... look it up.
How has the current mayor and police chief ruined the town?
The board meetings are a joke but it’s not because of the mayor. The aldermen and mayor have both acted inappropriately.

@10:37. If you do not know what the Mayor and Chief have done to this town then you are out of the loop. You need to do some snooping around. Look how many people that have left the town now. Thats by design. The best is yet to come. Just wait and see.

@10:32 Please enlighten me with your facts.

fact 1-- She won the election by a lie. She didn't live in Pelahatchie
fact 2-- Kevin Poole our Chief fired her mother
fact 3-- She ran to get vengeance on our town for firing her mom because she could not do her job [according to the chief]
fact 4-- the mayor said publicly that she wanted to get rid of everybody at the first board meeting
fact 5-- the mayor wanted to cut everybody's pay at that meeting
fact 6-- she has harassed her employees since day 1
fact 7-- the mayor and chief are the reason the town is in a financial bind [trying to get people in trouble over drug seizure money which is not missing]
fact 8 -- the chief and the mayor are in this together which is funny because he is the one who got her mother fired
fact 10--I haven't got time to state every fact but they are more. just chew on these for a while

7:34, you are correct in one tiny sense. The money isn't missing. It was misspent. It was supposed to only be spent on money for improvements within the police department. It was not meant to pay salaries for city employees. It was not meant to pay the city's bills. So, on that count, you are right. It isn't missing. It just went somewhere it wasn't suppossed to go.

I guess we we all know for sure when the auditor's report is published. That should pretty much clear everything up. If it shows something different than what it sounds like it will show, I'll be wrong

You, however, still won't be right. Like the mayor, don't like the mayor. Like the chief, don't like the chief. Who cares? They may, just may, both be on the side of right on this one.

Last I checked, the mayor wasn't the mayor when all those dollars were being misspent or even collected, for that matter. The chief should be using the money his department collected, but he can't. Debate whether it should have been collected all you want: it was collected, and it isn't there now for his department to use. Instead, it sounds like to me that the money collected paid for a whole lot of stuff that is way far outside fo the statute that designates what that money can be used for. If not, why in the heck would the auditor care?

But I may be wrong.

However, you are saying chief + mayor = collusion. Doubtful. Wrong-doing by people who came before both of them? Probable. Again, the cheif and the mayor may just happen to both be on the right side of right on this one issue. And if what you "say" happened, happened, is that so bad? Just means to me that two people who might not naturally get along can actually get along when they both see things happeneing that are flat wrong.

So, how about you check your facts, please?

Oh wait...you don't have any.

Did anyone see a post or report on this meeting? I don't find anything?