Update: Captured.
JPD is looking for a Vincent McGee in Northeast Jackson (Between Old Canton Road, Ridgewood Road, and Meadowbrook Road.). He fled from a traffic stop. The dude is dangerous. He was convicted of armed robbery and carjacking around ten years ago. He was indicted last fall for possession of cocaine and in January 2015 for being a felon in possession of a firearm. The indictment classifies him as a habitual offender. His indictment is posted below.
 |
| McGee |
22 comments:
Don't worry Eastover Patril is on the hunt! We are safe now!
He fled? Was he not pursued? Was it a foot-chase? Have you seen the 'physicality' of the JPD?
why is he not in jail
Shoot him dead so that we don't have to worry about the DA trying to free him.
Other news sources falsely reported Eastover. Actually west of I-55 near Meadowbrook. Though I am sure that Eastover "Patril" is on alert, 6:11. And yes, Curious at 6:19, he fled on foot. He was pursued. The JPD is going door-to-door.
There were narcotics in the car, and a female passenger is in custody.
Not only the crooks are fleeing in Jackson, so are the homeowners.
How SAD!
So for 10 years he did not commit a crime, but in 2015 he got caught using coke and having a gun?
Assuming he has not robbed in 10 years, that is an improvement, I know plenty of ole miss friends coking it up.
Sucks that once you are a felon you can no longer carry a gun. Should have known better.
But a little bit of blow after 10 years of no crime and some of you people want him dead?
Just keeping things here in perspective, but that's nuts.
That was a Jag he jumped out of. Maybe he got a really great job for 10 years, LOL. I believe he was eventually found South of St. Dominic's. I take it seriously when anyone flees police into a neighborhood and/or hospital and I am certainly grateful that JPD felt likewise.
We need to see an end to these high speed foot chases. Some poor citizen is sure to get hurt.
You're saying "the dude is dangerous," but the most recent (and only) violent crime you can list is from ten years ago? Not trying to shrug off carjacking, but it seems you are grasping at straws to get a rise out of your redneck audience.
He tossed a gun out of the car as he fled. He is currently facing two different indictments as a habitual offender. He took off running because he knew what would happen once caught. In other words, he was desperate and given his old convictions for violent crimes, dangerous as well.
now Kingfish, he was probably just turnin his life around, he might have been fixin to start college too
Kingfish,
No one is arguing that being a felon in possession of a gun is not a crime. However, until you use the gun for a violent purpose, it is not a violent crime.
I will fix your last sentence. "He was, . . . given his [decade] old conviction (no "s") for [a] violent crime(again, no "s"), dangerous as well." So, under that standard, does George W. Bush's decades-old DUI make him a drunk?
Again, Kingfish, no one is arguing the guy isn't should not be prosecuted for his current crime. It just seems you are overstating the story because that's what your readers want.
Location, location, location. 5 miles up the road he'd be looking at 3 life sentences.
Can you point us to your gig @11:12 so we can see how a professional does it correctly? Or are you only here in a piss ant costume?
Dear grammar police at 11:12, explain this sentence of yours:
"...no one is arguing the guy isn't should not be prosecuted..."
He isn't should not?
We all make mistakes, it's just that if you're going to police everyone else, you must be extremely careful yourself.
After reading the subsequent comments, I feel a little bit better about our society.
My only hope is that those first commenters who wanted the kid dead were too lazy / complacent / ignorant to break down what this person has so far done.
Disappointing Kingfish caters to this ignorant approach to justice.
Let's break down what Kingfish in 10:25 justifies and considers worthy of LOCKING AND LOADING. Worthy of potentially being on the look out to kill.
Timeline:
1) Kid is convicted of committing a felony crime
2) 10 years go by without incident
3) Kid gets caught using coke, and having a gun (did any of you go to college?) --gets indicted for both.
4) Pulled over for a traffic stop, freaks out, flees
5) He THROWS his gun away as he flees.
Yea, as a felon, and probably one without resources for a nice lawyer, he probably should not have been doing either things in number 3.
He chose to do so. When pulled over, he didn't want to get arrested, face consequences, and may have gotten scared and fled. He disarms himself and THROWS away his weapon. Sure, he may be desperate, but if violence was something he was expecting in the future, I doubt he would have disarmed himself.
Fascinating how things break down when we use this little thing called logic. This post has me seriously thinking about KF's motives at best, his intelligence at worst.
Motives? LMAO @1:41. An anonymous nobody bitching about motives? Get over yourself.
Location, location, location... He was trying to get over to the protective Ward 3
"An anonymous nobody bitching about motives? Get over yourself." - says anonymous nobody bitching about another anonymous comment. Now please, get back to work before you get fired from your secretary job.
There's a lot of knit picking going on around here.
"knit picking"?
Post a Comment