Jackson Ward 2 City Councilman provided these updates from the budget hearings on his Facebook page this morning:
Yesterday, we went through the police, department, public works, and fire department's proposed budget. The math is right on the line, but it looks like we don't need to do a water sewer rate increase if water billing actually improves.This update was posted Tuesday:
What's interesting about that is that it is a result that contradicts the recommendation we received from Raftelis, the consultants we hired to analyze our system and rates for $750k two years ago.
On the one hand, I posted months ago that I would not vote for a water rate increase because of the failure to get our house in order.
On the other hand, the numbers and explanation presented differ from the analysis we paid the experts big money to generate. Raftelis is proving to be another example of paying big money to hire consultant whose advice we ignore or who get fed bad information or who get paid to tell us what we already know.
If we are turning a corner in water sewer, that is awesome and one of the few bits of good news we've gotten lately. But if our maintenance costs go up just a bit or our revenue is down just a bit from what is proposed, we'll have no choice but to raise water rates mid-year.
Overall, the city is facing a big budget deficit. The solution presented by the mayor so far is to have a property tax increase to increase revenue by between 3 to 4 million dollars, eliminate unfilled positions in the police and fire departments to save approximately 3million, elimnate unfilled positions in public works, cut back on the operations and maintenance budget in public works and cut in half the amount of money the city holds in reserve in case of an emergency. Add on to that a few staff reductions in city hall to save a few hundred thousand, that's what has been presented so far.
Today we will hear from department's like parks and human and cultural services where there look to be substantial cuts proposed to youth programs. Will let you know what's on the table once we get clarity as to where the cuts genuinely fall. There was a great deal of conflict earlier in the week because the budget as given to us did not accurately present the true scope, location, and depth of the cuts proposed.
Day 2 of budget hearings just wrapped up.
I had hoped that by giving the Mayor an extra week to prepare, we would have a solid budget proposal to work from.
Instead, the budget proposal is full of holes.
Rather than input what they are actually proposing into the budget, they've literally peppered the budget with random minus signs. So, for example, the budget proposal reads that we are going to keep funding for the zoo the same, but then when you start to talk about the zoo they go "oh, actually we are really proposing to cut the zoo budget by 25%. See that minus behind a number in the column for something completely unrelated a couple of pages away, that's the placeholder we made for a budget cut until we figure out what to really do."
I'm not kidding. That is what is actually happening.
Likewise, the mayor's outside budget consultant began this affair yesterday morning saying that there are 7.56 million worth of cuts in his proposal. At the end of two days, however, nobody has been able to show 7.56 million worth of cuts because "departments are still identifying what and where they can cut." Frighteningly, even when a department head identifies a cut, two seconds later we're told that the recomendation will be different and ignore that number.
This is the definition of being trickle truthed. The counsel can't honestly assess this proposal because the numbers written down are not the actual proposal. It's like they hope that we won't grasp what's actually being proposed because the line items we really focus on aren't being changed, it's these "placeholders" that are being sprinkled in where the cuts are.
Police, fire, and public works are up for tomorrow. The cuts proposed on police seemed big even before today. Now that we know the extent to which the budget is such an unfixed proposal, it is going to be a particularly Herculean task to discuss these departments and to track where the money is moving and set a true budget that is best for the city.
21 comments:
Paid a consultant 3/4 million dollars for nothing?
Pray for the COJ. Broken down on so many levels.
I wonder if the "mayor's outside budget consultant" is the same one he uses for his personal budget?
Another property tax increase? Jackson is LOST and Yarber is kaput.
Just what Jackson needs, a property tax increase. Has anyone given any thought to all of the abandoned houses in Jackson. Raising the tax rate to cover up the lack of leadership may bring more abandoned houses. If there is any business left in Jackson look for it to be shopping the suburbs.
Just what we need. Give me people another reason not to want to live in Jackson. Genius! I'm so sick of inept, uneducated people leading this city. We simply need a business mind who can add/subtract and think logically. Jesus Christ...we have a mayor who couldn't even pay his mortgage...or chose not to. Either way, he's a clown with no ability to run even a lemonade stand. God, please help us!!
Did Jackson check into Raftelis before hiring them?
Did Flint Michigan recommend them for the work Raftelis did there?
Wake me when it's over........
### Metro Ad Valorem Millage Rates (2014-2015) ###
Jackson = 61.03 mils (<< Yarber's Tax Confiscation)
Jackson = 58.03 mils
Canton = 56.32 mils
Edwards = 47.0 mils
Clinton = 41.49 mils
Bolton = 36.3 mils
Byram = 34.1 mils
Flora = 34.5 mils
---> AVERAGE = 33.03 mils <---
Brandon = 29.0 mils
Madison = 28.8 mils
Terry = 27.85 mils
Pearl = 27.5 mils
Raymond = 25.62 mils
Florence = 22.9 mils
Ridgeland = 20.03 mils
Flowood = 20.0 mils
Richland = 19.0 mils
*excludes County & School District
Easy to understand. Too many on the teet, and too few to pay. Hell, even the mayor doesn't pay. What a joke. And, now they want to take the easy path, and milk us even more. Recipe for disaster. More reason to leave. Idiots!
That is one reason why I live in FLOWOOD!!!
Low taxes and EXCELLENT police.
People cannot expect much from a city that would elect a person for mayor that could not make his own house payments. Most of the Jackson citizens do not have to worry about the taxes as they do not pay taxes.
What a great plan - let's raise property taxes. Here is why they get away with it:
It doesn't affect a large percentage of the voting base since they either rent, drive a old POS with minimal tag costs, or drive a new car and get a tag in another county.
The Fondren and Belhaven crowd think it is actually doing some good and have so much white guilt they take it.
The Eastover and JCC crowd don't like it, but have enough money to not care.
The remaining try like hell to sell their house and move away to a neighboring county to avoid the madness.
Rinse and repeat for every administration.
There is a reason they are called ring suburbs.
What should we do about balancing the City's budget Amos? Duhhh I don't Andy, I thought you knew...
Name the two best things coming out of the City of Jackson: I-20 and I-55...
Embedded for Jacksonians is the 2-mil prop tax increase ol' Uncle Ben Allen sold to taxpayers as a temporary increase during Melton's term.
Bend over Jackson. Priester now saying city "is on the ropes" and tax increases must be north of Yarber's proposal.
Just yesterday I saw the really nice FBI headquarters building out on Echelon Parkway in Ridgeland. What's left in Jacktown? Is it the new Birmingham? Detroit? Memphisto?
Hinds County also going up 1 mil. They are just draining the corpses.
Going to have to go up quite a bit to get enough from the three remaining tax payers left in Jackson.
Post a Comment