The Covid-19 pandemic has raised a lot of serious questions with very few scientific answers in spite of public admonitions to “follow the science.” One is not likely to find the science, much less follow it in corporate news sources. Unbeknownst to many of us, scientists are battling behind the scenes over some of the most basic suppositions media have reported as “science” or facts. What if these basic suppositions are neither science nor facts?
Few people know about, and media have not covered a lawsuit filed July 19, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama: America’s Frontline Doctors, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Xavier Becerra, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, et al., Defendants.
The lawsuit begins by questioning the most fundamental fact that the vast majority of people have accepted as true, that is whether the Vaccine Emergency Use Authorizations (EUA) are unlawful. Wow! This section of the lawsuit argues seven points in a spaghetti-like mix of medical and jurisprudential terms, the first of which is, “There is No Emergency.” How would you like to argue that in legal and medical terms?
The second point is even more hair-raising against the most commonly agreed upon “science” of the pandemic: “There is in Fact no Serious or Life-Threatening Disease or Condition.” Remember, these points were written by a consortium of doctors and lawyers following not only federal law, terminology and definitions, but also medical and scientific terminology and definitions.
The following are the remaining points, 3 - 7, under section A:
(3) “The Vaccines Do Not Diagnose, Treat or Prevent SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19.”
(4) “The Known and Potential Risks of the Vaccines Outweigh their Known and Potential Benefits.”
(5) “There Are Adequate, Approved and Available Alternatives to the Vaccines.”
(6) “Healthcare Professionals and Vaccine Candidates are Not Adequately Informed.”
(7) “Monitoring and Reporting of Adverse Events.”
Please bear in mind that federal lawsuits like this one raise questions that are adjudicated in the federal courts, and are likely to be appealed regardless of initial outcomes. In other words, this ain’t no debate on Facebook.
Federal lawsuits don’t move nearly as predictably as court cases on TV, and this case is a slow mover for sure. To date, the court has acted or reacted 22 times regarding procedures. The next scheduled action is a telephone conference call Tuesday, September 21, so the judge and parties can discuss various issues. Judge Corey L. Maze has set two other dates, October 15 and November 5, for submissions from both sides.
What impact might this lawsuit have on how the federal government acts or reacts to other health related situations? Will there be any implications for other governing authorities like states and municipalities? Sadly, most of us would likely agree this whole thing has been politicized way too much, though we couldn’t agree in a hundred years who politicized it, who was right, or who was wrong.
Doctors and other health providers have normally been highly respected. Nevertheless, the politicization of Covid has sullied even some of the most revered medical professionals. Trust and respect are two of the most important character traits doctors and healthcare professionals need to practice medicine. Smart communities value their local healthcare professionals.
Daniel L. Gardner is a syndicated columnist who lives in Starkville, MS. You may contact him at PJandMe2@gmail.com.
13 comments:
2022
I'm still going to get my Booster & flu shot NO MATTER how the lawsuit turns out.
This is 8-10 batshit crazy MDs along with a handful of people with no medical education sharing a desire to get attention and get donations from the gullible. I have don't know personally what their goal(s) are, other than to raise money from non-doctors, but none of them - not a single member, N-O-N-E, are not "highly respected" by doctors and none "highly revered" in the medical or scientific community. In fact it is quite the opposite - respected and "revered" members of the medical profession, as well as those of us mere mortals who are just plain ol' doctors, have repeatedly expressed complete disagreement for this group's "ideas" as well as its attempts to portray itself as a medical organization. In short, they are far outside any reasonable medical opinions and are widely and publicly disdained.
From what I know, they are a handful of politically-motivated assholes trying to make money from a real health crisis. From a legal standpoint, these silly-assed filings are as DOA as the presidential election lawsuit nonsense of the last election cycle. These filings are nothing more than an attempt to separate the gullible from whatever money they are foolish enough to contribute. Even if you make the serious mistake of failing to get vaccinated, don't compound your stupidity by giving "organizations" like these money. No one is being forcibly vaccinated so there is no need to donate to anyone claiming to be defending against it.
Mississippi has its own version, founded by a doctor with repeated suspensions for drug addition and other issues. These assholes don't want to protect you, they want to take your money.
Wish I could have back the 60 seconds I just wasted reading that QPost from Starkville’s own Scoop Cunningham.
Well written and well researched. Bravo, DG
What if the ocean is neither water nor wet? What if human diseases were actually caused by invisible malevolent goblins? There’s no telling what all the “scientists” have been lying to us about. They told us we can’t end a sentence with a preposition and that was BULLSHIT.
Do you know what you call a person who graduates last in medical school?
Doctor
BRILLIANT! Truly, what we're hearing on TV, about the (supposedly) real-life "crisis", is (mostly) demonstrably as made-up (and implausible/invalid/fabulist-generated) as what you'd see on shows like 'Law & Order'.
Remember the episode, where somebody was selling real cadaver bones as a (somehow cheaper) substitute for plastic ones used as implants (and somehow nobody noticed)? ...and some dust from the bones got wafted to the ceiling, and then fell down in tiny bits, to be inhaled by some people, who then got cancer, because the bones had been from cancer patients?
That's a ridiculous premise, of course. But it's no more ridiculous than some of the "Science-based" Pandemic Theatre we've been expected to enact in our daily lives.
Yes...well...one can only hope that the lawyers that filed this lawsuit will have their license to practice law revoked just like Guiliani et.al.
Of course, it's Alabama where they have judges that wouldn't survive a psychiatric exam without being involuntarily committed.
It's the Computer Ninja Arizona result that gave Biden a few MORE votes not a hint to the "true believers" that they've been played? Their friends and relations who are anti-vax dying in disproportionate numbers doesn't work?
How about Mississippi ranking with Peru in highest deaths per 100000?
Being last in nearly every positive measure and first in negative measures from education to economic growth etc. isn't a hint either.
So sad...
Well, I finally wasted a few minutes and read a D L Gardner post on this site. And yes, I truly wasted those minutes.
But what trapped me into reading the entire post (you know, the click here to read.....) was that he was going to spew some rhetoric as fact, and started with a "WHAT IF......" premise.
Anytime someone starts a discussion of anything fact based, but begins with a "what if" scenario, you know it isn't going anywhere worth spending time with the discussion. And here, Gardner held true to that axiom.
Next question could be, what if these 'doctors and lawyers' who drafted this bullshit lawsuit actually had anything the base their arguments on, other than what Gardner proposes as "the most fundamental fact that the vast majority of people have accepted as true, that is whether the Vaccine Emergency Use Authorizations (EUA) are unlawful. "
Please Mr. Gardner, tell us how this is a 'most fundamental fact' and on what basis can you claim, (other than your bullshit opinion) that a VAST MAJORITY OF PEOPLE HAVE ACCEPTED AS TRUE.
Actually, I guess I'm glad I read this piece - it confirmed my previous opinions that these posts by Kingfish are just space fillers, and scrolling on by them is time well spent.
My Name is Doctor wrote:
"Do you know what you call a person who graduates last in medical school?
Doctor"
Not exactly, "Doctor." He or she has an MD so "doctor" isn't technically inaccurate but he or she better not open a practice and start accepting patients the next day. There is a lot of work ahead of that and every other med school grad (last, first, or somewhere in-between in every class) before they are _doctors_ in the strict (and legal) sense. Same thing with lawyers - a JD and bar card aren't the same thing. Actual doctors know all this.
I have no idea of the class rankings of any of the handful of doctors in this and similar political organizations claiming to be "medical associations" but I can tell you neither the organizations or the tiny handful of members in them are respected in the least within the overall medical profession. Look no further than Mississippi's version of this and John Witcher's record with the state board.
A pandemic of the unhealthy should not have turned into to what we have now ! I find myself rooting for BLM in New York right now ! WTF MAN. Seriously folks, is this some weird alternate universe where a group of wokies actually end this scamdemic by using "racist" as the reason ? Great gawd almighty. Fact: Covid 19 was engineered by loyalist of The Great Reset and to their credit didn't kill 100 million to do it ! The reality is that this thing is about to go away but the end result....the mission was a success. The 2022 elections no matter who wins what will not change this. America as we knew it is dead.
"A pandemic of the unhealthy..."
Not even possible in medical or even common-lexicon terms but don't let such trivialities get in the way of the nonsense.
Post a Comment