Attorney General Jim Hood issued the following press release:
Clinton Resident Arrested for Possession of Child Pornography
 |
| Wrigley |
Wrigley was arrested Wednesday at his home by investigators of the Attorney General's Cyber Crime Unit/Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force with assistance of the Clinton Police Department. Investigators executed a search warrant following an investigation of suspicious online activity and seized evidence relevant to the charge.
Wrigley was booked into the Hinds County Detention Center. No bond has been set at this time. If convicted, he faces up to 40 years behind bars. As with all cases, a charge is merely an accusation and a defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.
This case will be prosecuted by Special Assistant Attorney General Brandon Ogburn of the Attorney General’s Cyber Crime Unit.
11 comments:
he wont last long
Glad this thug is off the street.
Glad you included that presumption of innocence disclaimer here. Must just be oversight when it doesn't make it into reports from Jackson.
By the way, that "thug" is a disabled veteran. He got back from Iraq just two years ago. He got his back blown up while fighting for yours and my freedom. Better presumed innocent until proven guilty.
5:13 Explain how a combat-related injury causes pedophila.
We're listening.
5:13; I hope you're his lawyer and intend to use those statements in his defense.
Are we talking about five and six year old kids, or was this guy watching amateur sex videos of girls who were a few weeks shy of their 18th birthday? We never seem to get an explanation of what "child pornography" really is, and I think this is one crime wherein degrees matter.
Yes. I know the last time I was in a bad accident, the trauma revisited caused me to want to watch naked children in sex acts. Please put a note in my defense file.
It NEVER ceases to COMPLETELY amaze me at some of your stupidity.
5:13 Explain how a combat-related injury causes pedophilia.
7:36 Yes. I know the last time I was in a bad accident, the trauma revisited caused me to want to watch naked children in sex acts. Please put a note in my defense file.
Jim Hood is a master at releasing these "press releases" that lead people like you to the conclusions HE wants.
You nor I have any idea what this man has done-- pedophilia--sex acts REALLY
you people jump all over the place--please do not let facts or lack of get in your way. Did you know that a 19 year old sleeping with a 16 yr old could be a sex offender, a 19 yr old looking up 16 yr old pictures is a sex offender. These is an area that does need explanation. You might be shocked with what some have done and then made to register as a sex offender.
I also find kf running with this a lot disingenuous. I have written in a number of times to bring attention to a child pornography case of a 36 yr old with hundreds of pics of girls under 12 that he had been doing for years and only received 6 months from tough judge weill--6 months. It is all about who you know!!!! Not only has it not been looked into to show what is going on here in Jackson with our "judges" but many of my post are not even published.
Wait to find out the FACTS!! All of you have NO idea how quickly and easily that could be your picture. The computer can get you to a bad place
before you know what has happened.
NO I DO NOT EVEN KNOW THIS GUY. I WILL WAIT FOR THE FACTS BEFORE I jump to conclusions.
2:50 - You won't 'jump to conclusions' yet you seem to have reached four or five of them in your disjointed diatribe.
The decision whether or not to charge a person with a crime typically involves something referred to as an *investigation*.
5:56 That is very funny. You are either involved or completely clueless. The "press release" is from a guy (Hood) who totally has an political agenda and did not give any evidence of what this guy had on his computer and yet people are jumping to conclusions of him being involved in "sex acts and pedophilia".
First, the way they conduct these "investigations" many times leaves a lot to be desired.
Second, I can tell you of ONE case that jumps to mind that after the "investigation" could lead a couple of ways; however, because it was during the election time and in spite of the person from the AG office and several of the investigators thinking this should not be pursued--Hood wanted/needed the publicity. There was NOT ONE THING INVOLVING JUSTICE.
Third, I am so sorry you seemed to have trouble reading 2:50.
Forth, let me explain to you jumping to conclusions-you have NO idea how or when any picture got on this guys computer yet people are making him out to be a pedophile and involved in sex acts--that from the release is jumping to conclusions.
Fifth, he may be totally guilty or he may not WE DO NOT KNOW
That damn innocent tell proven guilty thing is completely gone today. If it is written it MUST be true. So I realize I am draconian in thinking/ believing in waiting to hear the facts circumstances before I stone someone. So be it.
Post a Comment