Jackson Jambalaya

it's beyond comical now. he knows he's going to jail & i can just visualize him squirming like a little baby at the thought of it. it's NOT going away claiborne, you ARE going to jail so you're really making it worse on yourself to continue these games. just gives you more time to squirm.....get it over with already

Is anyone surprised? Claiborne will continue to change attorneys for this reason. This is the third or fourth attorney. Each time the attorney asks for time to prepare. What's to prepare, he pled guilty. How much longer will the judge be patient? If they do sentence on the 16th of April, I hope he isn't given any time to report, but will be taken into custody. He should have his affairs in order by this time.

I DON'T KNOW, LOOKS LIKE HE KNOWS HOW TO PLAY THE SYSTEM AND THE JUDGE IS LETTING HIM DO IT. HE IS PLAYING THE JUDGE LIKE HE PLAYED EVERYONE ELSE.

I DON'T KNOW BUT LOOKS LIKE HE IS PLAYING THE JUDGE LIKE HE PLAYED EVERYONE ELSE.

I saw hiim at Barnette's getting blonde highlights and a Karatan treatment for summer...or maybe for prison. I doubt the stylist at the prison will be as good as the colorist at Barnette's

Legal experts: the defendant has plead guilty, and already unsuccessfully tried to withdraw that plea. Now he just retained a new lawyer.

Question: what can the new lawyer possibly do, besides attempt to convince the judge to issue a shorter/lesser sentence? Isn't that literally all that any lawyer could possibly do at this point?

The new lawyer could argue that the guilty plea was the result of ineffective assistance of counsel from the old lawyer. It's a delay tactic more than a successful argument.

Has Austin or C.E. been sentenced yet?

Has Austin or C.E. been sentenced?

Let him withdraw his guilty plea.

Since Austin and CE no longer have 5th Amendment objections, they will be compelled to testify against him.

What makes you think Austin and CE would be honest if they testified?

Yes C.E got 4 years with 3 years probation after time served. Austin got 51 or 52 months I believe with 3 years probation as well

This makes you wonder if the judge is granting all these continuances but not really liking having to do it. IF that is the case then he could get more time than he might had got had he just accepted the first judges sentence. Looks like serious jail time to me by the way hes acting.

Thank You for letting me know about the sentence. I have been looking on the internet, but have not seen any recent updates.

No problem but kingfish actually had post addressing sentencing. Credit is actually on kingfish reporting..... Thanks for staying on this story

6:20 Mr. Fish has failed to report details about CE's sentence, as well as Austin's. CE's sentence has been reduced by Judge Starret and was NEVER FOUR YEARS as reported here. Four is DOUBLE what the true sentence is. I guess reporting exaggerated details gets people all pumped up and makes them slap themselves on the back and hate on people who made a mistake. CE made a serious mistake and Mr. Fish should report everything about this case when it happens, not just the crap that gets people all riled up.

7:44. Kingfish has failed to report post sentencing updates. Why do you think that is?

I reported CE got 31 months. That would be less than three years. i changed the post, my mistake.

I'm sorry. When there are so many Fraziers getting convicted and sentenced all the time, one gets them confused from time to time.

The original sentence in PACER said 40 months as you damn well know. Nice try, Mr. Frazier.

Mr. Fish, Mr. Frazier (CE I presume you are addressing) doesn't read your blog. His sentence was reduced and no big red banner ever rolled through your blog announcing it. I think it would be fair to your readers who are seeking information about this fiasco and the sentencing of each of these defendants to have all of the information. This will all shake out differently for each one of them, as it should.

I missed post that sentence had been reduced so my bad. 2 years or 4 years doesn't really make a difference. They're all 3 going to jail where they deserve to be. That's what gets folks "riled" up sir

As a victim of over $100,000 from this band of 3 - I know I will never see the money but rather than focus on that - I think a good start for those defending them on this board would be to encourage them to post an apology. The world is a forgiving place - but it starts with "I am sorry". Until all of the victims of their life style and choices hear those words people will continue to be riled up. I dont hate the Fraziers - what I hate is what they did to so many people - with apparently zero remorse. But that is their choice.

How did you expose yourself to a 100k loss?

To April 8, 2014 3:03. The previous post was not mine, but I can testify as to how many people were "exposed" to a $100K loss. They were in the contracting business and exposure to large sums of money is a common occurrence during the daily course of business. One or two months of delayed payments can easily mount up to $100K or more. Unfortunately, the Fraziers were experts at avoiding payments on time, and sometimes, not at all.

You are not self employed, but rather work for a wage. If you have not had ever been exposed to $100,000k loss, you are not making money as being self employed. Payroll is very week. That is just one exposure. Do not be stupid!

Your right, I don't work in the construction business, but my w2 for this year was in the mid 6 figures. So, all is well...