Jackson Jambalaya

So why can't the McDaniel campaign see the voter info?

Watson: I thought you majored in Pre-Med?
McDaniel: "Pre-med / Pre Law? What's the difference?

Watson: "Dean Wormer will have our asses for a frivolous lawsuit"

McDaniel: "Was it over when the Germans Bombed Pearl Harbor?"

Watson: "Road Trip Dude!" "Truth and Justice"

MCDaniel: "Melainie grab the Toga"

Watson: "Wait til Otis sees us? He loves US!

Um, because it has voters' personal info on it and it's against the law to share that?

I first knew him when he was wearing diapers, literally. It's so sad that he's helping (assisting, encouraging, enabling?)this dysfunctional, sad, weak or pathetic attempt at CM's, 'tilting at windmills' self-lovefest.

Please, for the love of all that is sacred, holy or revered in your world, make it stop.

Razor

Still waiting on Melanie to comment on her failure to file mandatory reports with Del. Was she too busy in the back room of Mack's campaign?

Melanie is quoted on FB saying
"Chris McDaniel truly has the most amazing supporters any public figure could ask for!! "

Well those that followed Jim Jones were most amazing too.

Barbourites be up way past they bedtime last nite.

Heard of Gallo and he's calling the "tour" as the Chris and Melanie Tour! Couldn't agree more!

What about Melanie not filing her Ethic's Commission report?

The way I see it, whats good for the goose is good for the gander. The campaigns and PACs get in trouble for not filing required FEC reports. Kay gets in trouble for the non-reporting of the apartment in DC or wherever it is. Fair enough and I do mean that. That also means Melanie gets it for not filing her required reports. Funny how Senator McDaniel managed to do so and he was the candidate.

10:34 pm please try to not make it so obvious that you haven't read the post or else do not comprehend what you've read!

Illegal immigrants were dropped off by the bus loads in Brandon and other parts of Rankin County over the weekend. Thank you Thad Cochran!

Landrum is a Circuit Judge not a Chancellor [Chancery Court Judge].

9:03 And how exactly could Thad have single-handedly prevented this?

The problem is Obama, aided and Abetted by Harry Reid, trying to "transform" the country.

The only way to counter this is for the Repubs to control the Senate AND the House. Sending Childers to the Senate would have the exact opposite effect of what we need.

I agree with the Jim Jones and Don Quixote references posted recently. This whole Cult of Personality from the True Believers is getting tiresome.

So we need a post-election "Truth and Justice" campaign?

Here it is:

TRUTH: Thad Cochran won and is the Republican Nominee for re-election in November.

JUSTICE: McD lost in the Supreme Court, will lose summarily again on his bid for a rehearing of the prior decision that was En Banc, and will ultimately be sanctioned along with his lawyer friends for an election challenge suit that has no hope of success.

MCA 25-61-5(2) requires a public body to produce public records, and if the public record contains non-public records they must redact and make the public material available. This section also allows the public body to charge a reasonable fee for redaction of the exempted material.

This section was added when HB 474 was passed during 2008 Regular Session. McDaniel and Watson both voted for this bill. Hypocrites.

wow! I can't believe how scared the thad trolls are about the truth coming out in regard to criminal activity perpetrated against McDaniel. They will say and do anything to distract the attention from the truth. It reminds me of the ignorant tactics used by the black cockeye to derail voted ID. After all, like uncle bennie said to uncle Thaddeus, " you owe's us blacks for delivering that victory to you".

11:10 - remind us again how McDaniel and his supporters are welcoming AA voters into the tent...

Ouch. Mr. Watson, will you and Mr. Tyner kindly assist Mr. Thornton in removing Mr. Slay's foot from his ass.

That is how it should be done. None of that "we are considering our options" and "we may be able to work out an agreement..." pasive nonsense. Slay just lays it out.

11:10 - You just proved to everybody reading this how easy it was for a particular assumption to be made about Mr. McDaniel and his supporters. And surely I do not have to spell out what that assumption was/is.

About this bus load of illegals, does anyone have hardcore viable proof this "busing" is occuring? I'm pretty well connected in Brandon and Rankin County and haven't heard anything other than baseless rumors.

@9:03, where is the proof, or the bases of that comment?

Clearly the McDaniel supporters didn't read the legal filings KF posted or if they did, were unable to comprehend what they read.

Dear tea party,
I'm sure that there really are good people with in your group, but I see some of the most childlike vile comments on this blog from you guys.
Unfortunately, what has transpired with this campaign and the runoff put a really bad taste in people's mouths because of a nursing home break in AND BEING LOCKED IN THE HINDS COUNTY COURTHOUSE AFTER HOURS NEAR BALLOTS!

Do you honestly wonder why the MAJORITY OF MISSISSIPPIANS DONT WANT YOUR ASSES TO SEE OUR PERSONAL INFO. DEAR GOD IM GLAD IT EXISTS, THAT LAW. I WOULD NOT WANT MY PERSONAL INFORMATION TO BE UPLOADED ON THE INTERNET BY YOUR VOLUNTEERS OR BE HANDED TO THE PUBLIC BECAUSE WE DO NOT TRUST YOU WITH STUFF LIKE THAT!
I'd sure rather have a couple of cases of cross over voting than for the circuit clerks office to give you a list you could hawk on the internet for the eventual IDENTITY FRAUD that very well could take place.

And the Cesspool Widens!!

http://gotnews.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=163&catid=92&Itemid=1768

Staff and friends of Wicker and Harper are knee deep in this POO.

8:10 am - I went to that link and just see a one-sided "scoop" provided by Michael Watson's wife.

McDaniel has filed his reply to Harrison county. It's more of the same.

10:52, you are quoting the public records law properly: it does require redaction of a great many things, and it does 'allow' the local county to extract bureaucratic fees for the removal of info from election-materials.

In the McDaniel lawsuits in state court (they won three test-cases but then lost before the MS supreme court), the question was about conflicting state laws. In particular, whether the candidate-on-the-ballot was even MAKING a "public records" request... aka subject to redaction and fees... or whether instead the MS election-statutes, which specifically give the *candidate* full access to the original election-materials, was a law which trumped the redaction&fees. (Supreme court of MS says: no.)

In the separate TTV lawsuit, filed in federal court on 7/1 and refiled on 7/8, the question is again about conflicting laws: this time, the 1997-and-2008 pub-rec-law of the state of MS, versus the 1993 federal NVRA law. The folks at TTV say the NVRA only permits states to redact SSNs, and that it does not permit 'fees'. This case has yet to be decided.

At the end of the day... even if TTV loses... seems like McDaniel can still get all the evidence necessary for the election-challenge lawsuit (which has yet to be filed pending the outcome of these election-material-access lawsuits). It will cost $20/hr + $0.25/pg in the dozen-or-so counties that have not yet provided full access.