Jackson Jambalaya

Why post the entire order. It only makes perfect sense. You might post it if it had been controversial or if it contained questionable demands. Admit it KF; McDaniel has constitutional rights no matter what you, Steffie and Gallo think.

Where have I said he did NOT have that right? If anything, he does indeed have that right. Nice try, little liar.

public ridicule = attempted chilling effect = alinsky's and barbour's (GOP's) only visible tactic presently, probably because haley's got his "bozos for barbour" spin-doctoring campaign spun up by now....and maybe that's why there have been less dumbass incendiary remarks by the barbour children lately

Chrissy's rear better be real greasy for the projectile coming soon.

Settle down KF. These wingnuts are crazy. Obsessed. Loonie. You should know that by now.

"Diminishing minority votes does not become acceptable because it is motivated by political gain rather than racial animus. Historically, political operatives have excluded minorities for political purposes. Politicians shut out African Americans in the late 1800s because many voted Republican. They also excluded African Americans in the 1900s because many would have voted for pro-integration candidates.27 Diminishing the votes of minorities poses special dangers because it reduces incentives for cross-racial coalitions, increases incentives for politicians to scapegoat minorities, and fuels racial division. The unique dangers of voting discrimination are so significant that we altered the Constitution through the Fifteenth Amendment to prevent the practice."

My reading of this is that it doesn't look good for McDaniel. That's a shame, because candidates ought to be able to inspect the unredacted election records as they prepare to file a complaint of election contest.

How else can they know for sure whether illegal votes were cast if they cannot get access to the complete records? How can they match up, for example, affidavit ballots with the pollbooks without DOB information in the pollbooks?

By law they can look at the affidavits and actual ballots in the ballot boxes - affidavits bearing SSN numbers, DOB, etc. - but now we find out that the pollbooks are off limits to them until they are redacted?

In fact, before 1997, candidates had complete access to election records, inside the box and outside, going back at least 60 years.

Now they only have access to the records INSIDE the ballot box, but incomplete access to the outside-the-box records.

To my mind, that's just crazy.

Anybody who reads this blog on a regular basis can readily see where KF comes down. Unbiased? About as unbiased as Gallo, that idiot JT and Steffie. "Little Liar"? I think it's clear who the liar is.

Why don't you provide some specific examples of the pro-Cochran bias?

funny. The week of the runoff a certain County Republican Party Chairman well known to many accused me of helping the McDaniel side.

Bush v. Gore state style. McDaniel knows he is Gore in this thing right?

I think it's not so much that Kingfish has posted Pro-Cochran material (he's too smart to do that and get called on it), it's that he has published a plethora of comments ridiculing McDaniel and his supporters. Most adults are capable of connecting dots. Maybe it stems from the fact that JJ has made a fistful of dollars running Cochran ads. Just a guess.

There have also been a plethora of comments approved critical of Senator Cochran as well as one of his employees. Might want to go read my two posts "Epigrams and Interludes". Obviously you did not do so.

If you can't take a sponsor's money and write something they don't like, then get out of the business.

There are more comments ridiculing McDaniel supporters simply because it's so much easier.

There are also more comments pointing out your factual errors.

Just read where a new Public Policy Polling survey found 37% of Mississippians voting in the Cochran/Daniels primary run-off would support the Confederacy in another Civil War.

I suspect 100% of the 37% belong to the Tea Party.

I was not talking about 'comments approved'. I am talking about Kingfish's personal posts ridiculing the candidate. Show me one ridiculing Cochran. You won't find one. If there were any, the ads would have dried up. Don't bite the hand that feeds you, or sumpin' like that.

7:52; I just read where a survey shows that people making stupid, self adoring posts return 98% of the time to see they got in under the radar.

7:52,

Nice try. Perhaps you would like some more relevant polling. 66% of Americans are dissatisfied with the Federal Government. That dissatisfaction has tripled in under 10 years.

Lobbyists, the corporate political machines, career politicians, progressives have all shot the milk cow so they could dine on fine meat. Well, that meat provides for only so long and once the meat is gone and there is no more milk, they didn't listen when someone tried to teach them to fish....... the will starve

The repeated mention of Alinsky is cracking me up.

Here's a guy that few heard of when he was alive and he's been dead over 40 years!

He gets brought up as a new boogeyman in the movie, " America" and of course, that's all anyone knows about him!

Do y'all really believe Alinsky had any ideas that originated with him and weren't used in one form or another centuries before to organize and certainly in the early 1900's?

You could make Charles Dickens or Victor Hugo into boogeymen with some of their quotes as well!

If you are going to use Saul Alinsky at least quote him accurately.

His last book was in 1971 but maybe you can still find it or find his " Rules for Radicals" on the Internet somewhere.

I doubt if you held a gun to the head of most community organizers they could tell you who Alinsky was!

You people actually believe Haley Barbour heard of Alinsky before some researcher on the right was looking for something bad to write about community organizers when Obama ran, put " radical" in their search engine and found " Rules for Radicals?

I just love how you use " the establishment" in your mantra like Alinsky did and then make him to be the influence of those you oppose at the same time.

ROFLMAO

July 15, 2014 at 4:57 PM:
I don't understand your ire at KF. Actually, I really don't understand what your argument is regarding posting the order. KF has posted each filing with little to know commentary apart from identifying what the filing is. How do you find that to be slanted?