Some Mayors will attempt to get around the Open Meetings Act by meeting with one or two aldermen at a time. The public never knows about it and the skullduggery takes place behind closed doors. The board meeting comes, there is little discussion, and presto- the subject action passes. Well, the Mississippi Supreme Court said no more. The Mississippi Justice Institute issued this statement:
Today, the Mississippi Supreme Court ruled that the Mayor and City Council of Columbus violated the Open Meetings Act when they previously met in prearranged, non-quorum size gatherings to discuss public business, intending to circumvent the Act. This is the first time the Supreme Court has ever addressed the issue of whether meetings of public officials in less than quorum numbers violate the Open Meetings Act. The Mississippi Justice Institute represented The Commercial Dispatch in the appeal.
"This is a huge win for the citizens of Mississippi and for open and accountable government," said Mike Hurst, Director of the Mississippi Justice Institute. "People are tired of backroom deals and secret agreements by government officials that affect their lives. The Supreme Court's opinion puts public officials and bureaucrats on notice – you cannot circumvent the law and do the people's business behind closed doors anymore. Today's decision is a monumental victory for transparency in government."
In 2014, the Columbus mayor scheduled multiple meetings with council members to discuss policy issues and determine matters involving economic development projects and renovation of city property. The meetings were not announced or open to the public. At the time, the mayor excluded a Commercial Dispatch reporter from some of these meetings. In December 2014, the Mississippi Ethics Commission held that the mayor and council violated the Open Meetings Act. The mayor and city council appealed the decision to the Lowndes County Chancery Court, which upheld the Ethics Commission's decision. The mayor and city council then appealed to the Mississippi Supreme Court.
The original complaint against the Mayor and City Council was filed by Nathan Gregory, who at the time was a reporter for The Commercial Dispatch, a Columbus newspaper. The Commercial Dispatch eventually replaced Gregory as a party in the case. The Mississippi Justice Institute represented The Commercial Dispatch in the appeal.
The Mississippi Supreme Court ruled, "The four pairs of subquorum gatherings, along with the fact that they were prearranged, nonsocial, and on the topic of public business, illustrated the City's intent to circumvent or avoid the requirements of the Act. The philosophy and spirit of the Act prohibit the City from intending and attempting to circumvent or avoid the requirements of the Act. Additionally, the plain language of Section 25-41-1 requires the subject gatherings to be open to the public. Thus, the City's failure to hold open gatherings violated the Act."
[The Ruling]
In concluding, the Supreme Court noted that, "Prearranged, nonsocial gatherings on public business that are held in subquorum groups with the intent to circumvent the Act are required to be open to the public under Section 25-41-1 of the Open Meetings Act. Thus, the trial court correctly found that the City violated the Open Meetings Act."
Peter Imes, General Manager of The Commercial Dispatch said, "The public should have access to its government's decision-making process, and this ruling upholds that idea. It's a win for open government."
Hurst concluded, "Whether raising taxes, spending taxpayer money or issuing regulations that affect people's lives and property, people want to know what their government is doing. This decision clearly tells government officials to follow the law and do public business in the open."
The Mississippi Justice Institute is also representing a local Meridian man against the Lauderdale County Board of Supervisors who have committed the same violations of the Open Meetings Act as found illegal in the present case by the Supreme Court. See http://www.msjustice.org/case/lauderdale-open-meetings-act/
The Mississippi Justice Institute was assisted in this appeal by Clay B. Baldwin, Esq. of the Baldwin Law Firm PLLC in Madison, Miss.
The Mississippi Justice Institute is the legal arm of the Mississippi Center for Public Policy. It represents Mississippians whose state or federal Constitutional rights have been threatened by government actions. Mississippi Justice Institute is supported by voluntary, tax-deductible contributions. It receives no funds from government agencies for its operations. To learn more about MJI, visit www.msjustice.org.
Kingfish note: Someone show this opinion to a certain Mayor of a town where Highway 16 meets Highway 43. He is rather known for using this tactic on a regular basis.
12 comments:
Excellent news! But I'm sure some of the dunderheads elected to office will hold back room card games instead. However, this is a great win for the taxpayers of this state. Transparency. One lawsuit at a time. <3 Sippi.
Won't stop Lumumba's collusion with Stokes to push whitey out of, and reduce whitey financial influence in, Jackson.
8:36- are you another White Supermacist!!
The behavior will not change.
I think 8:36 is an intelligent person who actually listens and watches what elected officials do. Somehow 9:10 thinks listening and watching is racist. More people should try that novel idea.
At the Brandon town hall meeting last night, the mayor (while defending decisions that were probably made in violation of the Open Meetings Act) referenced the increase in Brandon's population and said with great bewilderment, "I don't know where all these people are coming from."
I'm curious as to what the consequences will be if Columbus (or any other town) continues this practice. The ruling is great, but does it have teeth?
Unless there is significant punitive action taken against the offending mayor, council or Board of Supervisors, this will continue.
Does this mean they are going to have to discuss contracts to cronies in an open meeting instead of getting it agreed on privately? And when the item is called up on the meeting agenda it is quickly voted with no discussion? What's the purpose of running for office if yhou can't help your friends? And has anybody thought about how much time this is going to add to the meetings?
Flowood is just as bad
"Unless there is significant punitive action taken against the offending mayor, council or Board of Supervisors, this will continue." - Agreed...and Mike Hurst might be the man to make that happen.....Chad Lamar we have yet to see. Is he beholden to the corrupted Oxford plantation? Time will tell.
Let Madison, The City and Madison County be test cases.
Post a Comment