Friday, February 11, 2022

Ted Rall: How Sarah Palin May Save Defamation Law

 How easy should it be to sue a newspaper or other news outlet for defamation? Thanks to a 1964 Supreme Court decision and the proliferation of constitutionally dubious "anti-SLAPP" laws, it's virtually impossible for someone who accuses a media company of lying about him or her to get to trial, much less win a damage award. If your local paper decides to smear you, the truth is, there's not much you can do about it.

    Sarah Palin's lawsuit against the New York Times poses the first threat in years to the American press' ability to print whatever it wants. Opening statements in her trial began last week; the fact that a public figure is getting her day in court against a major newspaper is a news story in and of itself.

    The 1964 case New York Times v. Sullivan set a high standard for a public figure like Palin, or even a "limited public figure" like an editorial cartoonist, to prevail in a libel or defamation claim. Publishing an untruth isn't enough. Under Sullivan, the printed lie must be demonstrably damaging to the victim's reputation and must result from "actual malice." Actual malice, the court ruled, means that the publisher either knew that the smear was false before they published it, or that they demonstrated "reckless disregard for the truth."

    It is unusual for a publication to go so far as to knowingly print a falsehood with a view toward damaging someone's reputation, as the Los Angeles Times did to me as a favor to the LAPD in 2015, which owned the newspaper at the time, was a political ally of the then-publisher and wanted me destroyed in retaliation for criticizing police misconduct. As with most libel cases, Palin v. New York Times comes down to the second half of the definition of actual malice.
    On its face, the Times' actions against Palin seem to embody reckless disregard for the truth. In 2017, the paper published an editorial, "America's Lethal Politics," that pinned the blame for the shooting of a congressman on a Palin political TV ad. "The link to political incitement was clear," the paper claimed.

    It was anything but.

    As the Times put it in a correction posted several hours later, the Times editorial "incorrectly stated that a link existed between (Palin's -- though the paper didn't mention her by name) political rhetoric and the 2011 shooting of Representative Gabby Giffords. In fact, no such link was established. The editorial also incorrectly described a map distributed by a political action committee before that shooting. It depicted electoral districts, not individual Democratic lawmakers, beneath stylized cross hairs."

    "In our view, this was an honest mistake," Times lawyer David McCraw told the Washington Post in 2019. "It was not an exhibit of actual malice." But James Bennet, the editorial page editor who wrote most of the editorial, ignored his own fact-checker, who told him that the Times itself had already published an article debunking a link between Palin's ad and the Giffords shooting. The Atlantic, where Bennet had previously served as an editor, had also debunked the Palin-Giffords meme. In a business where "if your mother says she loves you, check it out" is the 11th Commandment, failing to check it out is, or ought to be, the very definition of reckless disregard for the truth.

    In recent years, however, most judges have been strongly biased against plaintiffs in defamation and libel cases and so have turned a blind eye to the reckless-disregard half of the "actual malice" definition under Sullivan. Newspapers and other media defendants have largely been able to get away with rhetorical murder using the "my bad" defense. 

    Adding to the media's ability to wield the First Amendment as a cudgel to destroy reputations are anti-SLAPP statutes. Thirty-one states, including many of the most populous, have anti-SLAPP laws in which the main effect is to make it close to impossible to sue for defamation or libel. In order to get to trial, defamation plaintiffs have to convince a judge that they would be likely to convince a jury at trial -- but they aren't allowed to subpoena evidence or depose witnesses to build their case. Many lawsuits die there.

    If a plaintiff fails, which they usually do because judges routinely ignore or don't understand the convoluted language of anti-SLAPP statutes, not only do they not get their day in court but they have to pay bloated legal expenses to the deep-pocketed corporate media defendant who libeled them. That's what happened to me in my five-year fight against the LA Times. Anti-SLAPP laws are a nightmare but they aren't going anywhere because they are supported by both pro-corporate conservatives and misguided liberals.

    Among some recent victims of anti-SLAPP laws are fitness icon Richard Simmons, who was ordered to pay $130,000 to the National Enquirer after he sued the tabloid for brazenly lying that he was transitioning to become a woman, and Stormy Daniels, who was ordered to pay Donald Trump $293,000 after she sued him for calling her a liar. In these and many similar cases, the law turned reality on its head and revictimized the aggrieved party. But even the American Civil Liberties Union won't stand up for them because the group reflexively supports anti-SLAPP, the Constitution be damned.

    If a New York jury, which is likely to be overwhelmingly Democratic, overlooks its political distaste for Palin and rules against the Times, the case may head to a U.S. Supreme Court that seems more open to the possibility of scaling back Sullivan. "How do you balance free speech rights with the right to your individual reputation, and in the context of public officials who have volunteered for public service and do need to be held to account?" asks former Palin attorney Elizabeth Locke. "Redrawing that balance does not mean that we lock up journalists or that any falsehood should result in a huge jury verdict. But imposing the potential for legal liability, which is virtually nonexistent with the Sullivan standard in place, would create self-restraint."

    No one wants to strip media companies of the First Amendment protections they need in order to do their work on a day-to-day basis. But it's also time to stop screwing defamation plaintiffs with meritorious cases, not to mention protecting lazy journalists. An artful and legally correct remedy would be for the high court to declare Sullivan (and the anti-SLAPP laws that rely upon it) unconstitutional (SET ITAL) as applied (END ITAL) rather than throw it out entirely. To restore sanity to defamation law and start to hold out-of-control media companies accountable, lower courts should be directed to establish two commonsense propositions:

    First, defamation claims should be allowed to proceed unless there isn't the barest possibility of prevailing at trial, in which case they should be tossed during an early-stage motion for summary judgment to dismiss. That's what anti-SLAPP case law says in states like California, where my case was litigated, but judges routinely hold defamation claims to a much higher, basically impossible, standard.

    Second, the Supreme Court should clarify that, while Sullivan indemnifies a defendant from being sued over an honest mistake that is quickly corrected, ignoring basic journalistic due diligence clearly constitutes reckless disregard for the truth.

    I never expected to write the following words, but here goes: Good luck, Sarah Palin.

    Ted Rall (Twitter: @tedrall), the political cartoonist, columnist and graphic novelist, co-hosts the weekly DMZ America podcast with conservative fellow cartoonist Scott Stantis. You can support Ted's hard-hitting political cartoons and columns and see his work first by sponsoring his work on Patreon.

COPYRIGHT 2022 CREATORS.COM

23 comments:

Anonymous said...

I’m also wishing luck to Dominion in its lawsuit against various right-wing media outlets, as well as the Sandy Hook parents in their suit against Alex Jones.

Anonymous said...

I agree that Sarah Palin is an Alaskan rube.
But I would rather hang out with Sarah Palin than a Fondrenite.
I agree that Sarah Palin says dumb shit.
But the left lied and slandered here so many times it was definitely a crime.
They also targeted her daughter long before she sought a career in entertainment. In fact, I believe her daughter simply leveraged the publicity that was forced upon her.

I believe Sarah qualified to be VPOTUS but she NEVER said she could see Russia. That was Tina Fey.

The left lied and slandered her despite her lack of qualifications.

Go get ‘em Sarah!

Anonymous said...

I would not mind seeing NYT lose but holy fucking shit, this guy's takes get dumber by the week.

Anonymous said...

I am sick of the liberal media destroying people's lives and hiding behind the First Amendment.

Also, I'm hoping Kyle Rittenhouse blisters those who lied about him, his efforts and the entire Kenosha incident.

Anonymous said...

So the Court will have to overrule N.Y Times v Sullivan?

Good luck with that.

Anonymous said...

“But the left lied and slandered here so many times it was definitely a crime.”

Really? What crime?

Slander is a tort. Not a crime.

Anonymous said...

The reason the Founders gave the Press such enormous power of immunity in the 1st Amendment was so they could be the people's watchdog...not their masters. The modern media must be reined in and held accountable for they have actually abused their discretion and purpose for having power by selling out to corporate profits and political power.

The 1st Amendment regarding Freedom of the Press should have an addendum proposed and enacted with guidelines that include knowingly making false statements or engaging in willful ignorance - and then outlining the penalties for such, that truly have some teeth.

That Sandman kid already won a multimillion $$$ settlement against CNN, Rittenhouse and Palin will likely be next.

Anonymous said...

mr ted rall knows about as much about libel and slander law as i know about the back side of the moon .palins lawsuit isn't going to change anything . if he thinks palin is gonna get rich on this one ,he's got brain damage.
free speech has been so broadened by the US supreme court , anything , anyone , or anybody can say or write anything that want about another with no liability.
this blog is living proof.
learn to live with it.
you just got to sit there and take it, especially if you are a public figure.

Anonymous said...

Please stop giving this bimbo another 5 minutes of fame.

Anonymous said...

@9:01 AM
No one reads your blog.
No one wants to read your blog.
No one knows you.
No one thinks about you.


Anonymous said...

How delightful it is that if she wins, FOX News will be defanged and Sean and Tucker will have to find something else to do.

And, oh, both Donald's will be in court the rest of their natural lives.

Anonymous said...

The freedom of speech is essentially freedom to try and influence others. If someone (press or individual) libels or slanders someone and it damages their reputation, they are basically diminishing or destroying that person’s freedom of speech. As things stand now, the press has freedom of speech; everyone else’s freedom is dependent on the desires of the press. Hope Sarah takes them to the cleaners and rewrites the law.

Anonymous said...

@10:27 AM
When Sarah Palin dies, she’ll be remembered for years and years to come.
When you die, no one will remember your name nor comment.
Translation: Fame is achieved, not given.

Anonymous said...

@10:45
Stay deluded.
It is very different when you make a bold statement that is true and is later verified by multiple parties then it is true.
Remember, Obama did illegally wiretap the Trump Campaign to benefit the Hillary Campaign and the Democrat Party.
It is a fact and was verified. Trump called it early and he was right a lot.

Anonymous said...

@11:22
She is infamous not famous.
Get it right.

Anonymous said...

@11:56 AM
Clearly, Palin is famous.
She was known BEFORE and AFTER her failed GOP nomination.

Anonymous said...

@9:33, sort of like you right wingers justify gun violence with the Fourth Amendment.

Anonymous said...

Correction Second Amendment

Anonymous said...

@12:21
Being famous for doing bad is called infamy

Anonymous said...

Kamara Harris and Sarah Palin are the same people

Anonymous said...

@8:18pm Hmmm, incisive take...

Anonymous said...

Lawsuit was dismissed.

Anonymous said...

9:01 here..........to all the libel and slander legal experts out there who said ms palin was going to tear a new asshole in libel law .....go back and read my post.
her case didn't even get to the jury.


Recent Comments

Search Jackson Jambalaya

Subscribe to JJ's Youtube channel

Archives

Trollfest '09

Trollfest '07 was such a success that Jackson Jambalaya will once again host Trollfest '09. Catch this great event which will leave NE Jackson & Fondren in flames. Othor Cain and his band, The Black Power Structure headline the night while Sonjay Poontang returns for an encore performance. Former Frank Melton bodyguard Marcus Wright makes his premier appearance at Trollfest singing "I'm a Sweet Transvestite" from "The Rocky Horror Picture Show." Kamikaze will sing his new hit, “How I sold out to da Man.” Robbie Bell again performs: “Mamas, don't let your babies grow up to be Bells” and “Any friend of Ed Peters is a friend of mine”. After the show, Ms. Bell will autograph copies of her mug shot photos. In a salute to “Dancing with the Stars”, Ms. Bell and Hinds County District Attorney Robert Smith will dance the Wango Tango.

Wrestling returns, except this time it will be a Battle Royal with Othor Cain, Ben Allen, Kim Wade, Haley Fisackerly, Alan Lange, and “Big Cat” Donna Ladd all in the ring at the same time. The Battle Royal will be in a steel cage, no time limit, no referee, and the losers must leave town. Marshand Crisler will be the honorary referee (as it gives him a title without actually having to do anything).


Meet KIM Waaaaaade at the Entergy Tent. For five pesos, Kim will sell you a chance to win a deed to a crack house on Ridgeway Street stuffed in the Howard Industries pinata. Don't worry if the pinata is beaten to shreds, as Mr. Wade has Jose, Emmanuel, and Carlos, all illegal immigrants, available as replacements for the it. Upon leaving the Entergy tent, fig leaves will be available in case Entergy literally takes everything you have as part of its Trollfest ticket price adjustment charge.

Donna Ladd of The Jackson Free Press will give several classes on learning how to write. Smearing, writing without factchecking, and reporting only one side of a story will be covered. A donation to pay their taxes will be accepted and she will be signing copies of their former federal tax liens. Ms. Ladd will give a dramatic reading of her two award-winning essays (They received The Jackson Free Press "Best Of" awards.) "Why everything is always about me" and "Why I cover murders better than anyone else in Jackson".

In the spirit of helping those who are less fortunate, Trollfest '09 adopts a cause for which a portion of the proceeds and donations will be donated: Keeping Frank Melton in his home. The “Keep Frank Melton From Being Homeless” booth will sell chances for five dollars to pin the tail on the jackass. John Reeves has graciously volunteered to be the jackass for this honorable excursion into saving Frank's ass. What's an ass between two friends after all? If Mr. Reeves is unable to um, perform, Speaker Billy McCoy has also volunteered as when the word “jackass” was mentioned he immediately ran as fast as he could to sign up.


In order to help clean up the legal profession, Adam Kilgore of the Mississippi Bar will be giving away free, round-trip plane tickets to the North Pole where they keep their bar complaint forms (which are NOT available online). If you don't want to go to the North Pole, you can enjoy Brant Brantley's (of the Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance) free guided tours of the quicksand field over by High Street where all complaints against judges disappear. If for some reason you are unable to control yourself, never fear; Judge Houston Patton will operate his jail where no lawyers are needed or allowed as you just sit there for minutes... hours.... months...years until he decides he is tired of you sitting in his jail. Do not think Judge Patton is a bad judge however as he plans to serve free Mad Dog 20/20 to all inmates.

Trollfest '09 is a pet-friendly event as well. Feel free to bring your dog with you and do not worry if your pet gets hungry, as employees of the Jackson Zoo will be on hand to provide some of their animals as food when it gets to be feeding time for your little loved one.

Relax at the Fox News Tent. Since there are only three blonde reporters in Jackson (being blonde is a requirement for working at Fox News), Megan and Kathryn from WAPT and Wendy from WLBT will be on loan to Fox. To gain admittance to the VIP section, bring either your Republican Party ID card or a Rebel Flag. Bringing both and a torn-up Obama yard sign will entitle you to free drinks served by Megan, Wendy, and Kathryn. Get your tickets now. Since this is an event for trolls, no ID is required. Just bring the hate. Bring the family, Trollfest '09 is for EVERYONE!!!

This is definitely a Beaver production.


Note: Security provided by INS.

Trollfest '07

Jackson Jambalaya is the home of Trollfest '07. Catch this great event which promises to leave NE Jackson & Fondren in flames. Sonjay Poontang and his band headline the night with a special steel cage, no time limit "loser must leave town" bout between Alan Lange and "Big Cat"Donna Ladd following afterwards. Kamikaze will perform his new song F*** Bush, he's still a _____. Did I mention there was no referee? Dr. Heddy Matthias and Lori Gregory will face off in the undercard dueling with dangling participles and other um, devices. Robbie Bell will perform Her two latest songs: My Best Friends are in the Media and Mama's, Don't Let Your Babies Grow up to be George Bell. Sid Salter of The Clarion-Ledger will host "Pin the Tail on the Trial Lawyer", sponsored by State Farm.

There will be a hugging booth where in exchange for your young son, Frank Melton will give you a loooong hug. Trollfest will have a dunking booth where Muhammed the terrorist will curse you to Allah as you try to hit a target that will drop him into a vat of pig grease. However, in the true spirit of Separate But Equal, Don Imus and someone from NE Jackson will also sit in the dunking booth for an equal amount of time. Tom Head will give a reading for two hours on why he can't figure out who the hell he is. Cliff Cargill will give lessons with his .80 caliber desert eagle, using Frank Melton photos as targets. Tackleberry will be on hand for an autograph session. KIM Waaaaaade will be passing out free titles and deeds to crackhouses formerly owned by The Wood Street Players.

If you get tired come relax at the Fox News Tent. To gain admittance to the VIP section, bring either your Republican Party ID card or a Rebel Flag. Bringing both will entitle you to free drinks.Get your tickets now. Since this is an event for trolls, no ID is required, just bring the hate. Bring the family, Trollfest '07 is for EVERYONE!!!

This is definitely a Beaver production.

Note: Security provided by INS
.