Shuwaski Young issued the following statement.
Shuwaski Young, a Christian conservative, veteran, and public servant, officially launched his campaign for the Republican nomination for Secretary of State in 2027 during an exclusive interview on SuperTalk Mississippi on June 27.
“I’m running to protect our elections, grow Mississippi’s economy, and keep our communities safe,” said Young. “This isn’t about politics, it’s about purpose. It’s time for continued strong, authentic, conservative leadership that delivers results for the people of Mississippi.”
.jpg)
A fifth-generation Mississippian, raised in Noxapater and Stallo, Young brings a deep-rooted commitment to faith, family, public service, and a strong business acumen He has served under both Republican and Democratic administrations in the Mississippi Secretary of State’s Office, as well as in the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
Young supports Mississippi’s voter ID law, REAL ID, and has proposed a tough-on-crime policy that prioritizes public safety in all 82 counties to improve Mississippi business climate. “No business will invest where workers don’t feel safe, and no child can thrive in chaos,” said Young. “ A safe Mississippi is a prosperous Mississippi, and I will never compromise on keeping our communities secure.
Currently serving on the Neshoba County Republican Executive Committee, Young says his campaign will focus on faith, freedom, and building a stronger future. “We’re going to prove that Mississippi’s best days are ahead rooted in conservative values and led by people who live them every day.”
15 comments:
I worked with him years ago when he was an intern at the SOS office, he is a good guy and would do well as the SOS.
This guy is full of shit. He is not a Republican. He is an opportunist. Look at his LinkedIn page. Still has all his Democratic acolytes listed. He is obviously very proud of this or he would have taken it down.
I like this guy. Of course the blacks call him an Uncle Tom, which is to be expected since he veered from the viewpoint that they feel every black person must adhere to.
How does the SOS impact crime? What am I missing?
Perhaps in funding?
Career Politician?
Sorry I don’t trust him. Ran against Guest in 2022 and for SOS as a democrat in 2023.
He needs to clean up his “Linken In” page asap.
Sorry, but SOS job doesn’t have anything to do with growing the economy or keeping communities safe. Hey, dude, read the job description before you seek the job.
Mark me down fo NO
Once a Democrat, always a democrat
Since when does the Secretary of State impact community safety in one county, much less all 82?
He shot his wad with black folk, realized they would not back him and became an overnight republican. Gets on Supersquawk two or three times and figures he's in the inside track.
But, no, 3:07, he's not a career politician. You would have to have held public office in order to be a politician. Running don't count.
..."into" the ring.
The Secretary of State doesn't fund anything or anybody. Would you like to try again? Three guesses for a quarter.
In defense of Kingfish and to correct 6:11...a hat going IN the ring is correct.
Take, for example, this question: While stirring, do I add salt TO the dish or INTO the dish? Here's the answer....
"In general, when describing adding salt to a dish while stirring, it's more common and natural to say "add salt to that dish".
Why "to" is preferred: "Add" and "to" are the typical pairing when describing putting something into or onto something else to increase, complete, or improve it, as is the case with adding salt to a dish while it's cooking.
Recipes typically use "add" with "to": "Add salt to the stew."
"To" emphasizes that the salt is being joined or united with the dish, enhancing its overall flavor.
Using "into": While grammatically correct, "into" with "add" is less common in this context.
"Into" can sometimes imply a more focused or vigorous action of putting something inside something else.
In summary: While both can be understood, "add salt to that dish" is the more conventional and natural phrasing when referring to incorporating salt into a dish while stirring during cooking."
I think the man is adding a hat TO those in the ring, not INTO the ring.
This is not a cooking lesson, so I don't expect ZeroPoly to weigh in. It's actually a lesson to the candidate on being real damn sure what he's getting into when he tosses hats.
Post a Comment