Jackson Jambalaya

I don't think the plaintiffs are undertaking to pay Irby's debts generally. I think that's just a case of poor draftsmanship. I believe the intent is to have the plaintiffs satisfy all claims against Irby that arise out of the injuries to, and deaths of, the decedents. So, if a hospital, or the ambulance service, or the funeral home, has a subrogation claim, or other claim, that arises out of the negligence of Irby, the plaintiffs will satisfy those claims. This is a pretty typical provision in a settlement agreement, but unusual language.

OK. So what's the hold up with Stuart's part of the case? Still to sick to remember or give a statement or tesify or even show up at a hearing? I hope he knows this isn't going away.

I think its a shot in the dark to see who they can identify and then attempt to satisfy any and all claim's against KI, both individually and joined, and fish around for encumbered assets with her name (and more importantly SI's name) attached.

The order states...


IT IS, FURTHER, HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs, shall, and are hereby ordered to, resolve any and all liens, loans, grants, mortgages, expenses, invoices or other payments of any kind or nature by any person or entity whatsoever that has a right to a claim for reimbursement or payment from Defendant Karen Irby.

Hey KF, any word on the State Supreme Court's decision regarding Judge Green's poetry?

KF, why didn't you credit Ipse Blogit for posting this first? You raise holy hell when people don't credit you for going to a courthouse and copying something from a docket.

I've had it for several days. Went by courthouse last week and got it. Ask Ms Dunn herself, she answered the phone when I called to check on it. I've given them credit before as I do everyone else. I scheduled it for today because I had the radio show post and the black caucus one scheduled for yesterday. I try to keep it under three to four in one day unless there is a good reason. Had nothing else planned for today becuase of it. Just worked out that way and yes, it does happen that way sometimes.

and by the way, I took up for them and pointed out how the JFP plagiarized, yes, plagiarized them, on the Chip Pickering story.

This is pure quid pro quo. She gave the Plaintiffs what they wanted in her B.S. deposition swearing that Stuart caused the wreck. Stuart is on record saying he can't remember anything, so it's now a slam-dunk $60 million win for the plaintiffs against Stuart. Covering her debts is chump change compared to the payoff. This whole thing reeks.