Jackson Jambalaya

An attorney with Mr. Teeuwissen's legal prowess should have seen this outcome. So what's his endgame? He definitely has something else up his sleeve.

Prowess?
teeuwissen is an idiot.

7:03a where's your proof? I'll wait.

He is an outstanding attorney in the area of governmental law. Outside of that I don’t know. But he was the smartest guy in the room at the COJ and also the county board.

The guy calling him an idiot likely got his ass handed to him by Pieter. There’s plenty of people that could be.

Get the name right. It's a complex name, but, get it right.

Teeuwissen and his partner obviously wanted this whole legal process to flounder and flop. They knew this would happen. It will come out in court that both screwed up while involved in the contract.

Well being DQ'ed is better that being KO'ed....

@7:31

the proof is the Court Order-

glad to see there is a judge out there who managed to get one right

@7:44 - the smartest guy in the room at the COJ or County board room? That ain't saying much. The county hasn't had a decent board atty since Ruma Haque died.

Was Simon & Teeuwissen, PLLC and Graves Legal Services, PLLC involved in the original set up of the Siemens deal?

They probably did it as a political favor to somebody. They ain’t dumb.

This outcome was obvious. What's not so obvious is phase two and three of this scenario. There is a plan. Stay tuned.

Anyone janking on Pieter is an idiot. Pieter is solid, smart and savvy. How I wish there were a dozen like him that could be spread around.

KF, I can't express how thankful I am to you for covering news like this. Quick question for anyone, I'm honestly confused and losing track of these lawsuits. I was under the impression that the City was suing Siemens. Obviously the City's the defendant here, which means Siemens struck first. Does this mean the city isn't suing Siemens or are there two cases going on right now?

So, the plantiff's attorneys got disqualified for having been involved in the original deal. Peiter for being the city attorney? OK. Granted he left the city shortly afterward because he knew how dirty this Harvey Johnson deal was, as a way to pay everybody off one last time while leaving office. But Andrew as "co-bond counsel"? Who was the city's attorney in this case?

OK. Answer here. None other than the one and only Sam Begley, who was the BOND COUNSEL that made hundreds of thousands of dollars out of this deal. Not co-counsel as Andrew was, actually being the counsel for the MS Development Authority. Begley who was arguing this case for the city was the guy that certified the bond deal as the city's counsel. When does he get his hand slapped as well, with the same sanctions?

Can't be too soon. Having three lawyers having to keep their mouths shut is a good thing, but adding another (who keeps his mouth in gear at all times, especially when he has had a little too much) is even better.

@9:03 so a court order translates to being an idiot? Ohhhh thanks for the lesson. Lol

Yes it does Pieter-

to 10;01....smart, savvy?....he didn't look that back in 2007 when he got his ass handed to him on a platter in the babes strip bar litigation/injunction hearing before wingate. don't take my word for it , look it up. at that time hw as representing the corrupt melton administration. the bar should look into this type of conduct , but they are too busy trying to decide where to go to lunch.

You 9:00 are forgetting the facts of that case. Seriously, he was representing the city. He told Melton what could be done within the law. Funny that one setback in court and you're ready to call the Bar lol
What about the other wins and how he protected the city and county. The money that could have been paid out for frivolous lawsuits. You go look it up but do take my word.

to 10:06...you don't know much about the practice of law do you?