Jackson Jambalaya

NCS is minority owned. That answers all questions in this thread. End of discussion.

Should have raised the bid enough to help compensate the JPS schoolboard members for their time to more thoroughly review his bid.

Just never get the feeling anything is done above board when "Jackson" is involved.

This is just a game.....Waste Management did a good job of putting it all on the record. Useful in future court proceedings.

And yet another reason why Jackson is a 3rd world corrupt ghetto.

Don't see where NCS/Waste Pro is registered with the MS Secretary of State...

I felt sorry for this guy.

I wonder what happened at Waste Management
for him to be sent on such an assignment.

I would rather be an entry level Cisco Rep with
the Golden Corral breaded shrip account.

They did not sign the addendum and it was for price of service in summer months(which is at a reduced rate) if they had signed the addendum and bid it also, they would have been higher, but they failed to bid or sign it and this made Waste Pro the bid winner at a fair price which included 9 months of school garbage and 3 months of summer garbage at reduced rate. Waste Mgmt seems to think because they had no price increase for 3years that they were owed special treatment, they raise prices on everyone else all the time. Waste Management does not like competition. Too bad! Competition is good for business! Proud of Waste Pro!

They did not sign the addendum and it was for price of service in summer months(which is at a reduced rate) if they had signed the addendum and bid it also, they would have been higher, but they failed to bid or sign it and this made Waste Pro the bid winner at a fair price which included 9 months of school garbage and 3 months of summer garbage at reduced rate. Waste Mgmt seems to think because they had no price increase for 3years that they were owed special treatment, they raise prices on everyone else all the time. Waste Management does not like competition. Too bad! Competition is good for business! Proud of Waste Pro!

my my....one more example to show just how corrupt those bottom feeders are...

https://business.sos.state.ms.us/corp/soskb/Filings.asp?224558

Anon 11:17 according to statements made Waste Pro did not sign the addendum either but still got the bid.

Just to clarify:

Cisco is the technology company that is the leader in networking equipment.

Sysco is the distributor of food service products.

So what was their answer?

WASTE MGMT REP SAID ONLY ONE COMPANY SIGNED ADDENDUM BUT THEY WERE INCOREECT, THE REASON WASTE PRO WAS AWARDED THE BID IS BECUASE THEY FOLLOWED PROCEDURE PROPERLY UNLIKE WASTE MANGEMENT. IM SURE THAT GUYS BUTT IS IN BIG TROUBLE, THEY LOST A CONTRACT WORTH ALMOST $1 MILLION BUCKS, THE BEST COMPANY WON AND TURNED IN ALL PAPERWORK TIMELY AND CORRECTLY.

5:58, here's some friendly advice. If you want to shine Waste Pro's shoes, that's cool. However, you would be well-advised to lose the ALLCAPS and stop being such a homer. Otherwise, the people who frequent this establishment will eat you alive.

curt,
we won't eat 5:58 alive, such behavior would be INCOREECT. we'll filet and poach him first.

I AM NOT HUNNGGRY TONIGHT! Did I spell that coreectly?

And, 5:58PM, after all the write-ups here of awarding contracts in this town, this stinks. You know it stinks and "the best company won" is BS.

Still wondering after WM proven performance and lowest bid, how an addendum or small detail is enough to dissuade leadership to choose an unproven vendor at a higher rate. Hmmmmmm.