Jackson Jambalaya

She's not about justice. She's about social justice, which is code for racism. In the social justice playbook, white people come to the courthouse with a high level of guilt where black people are historically oppressed, which excuses a hell of a lot of their actions.

Basing one's guilt on their race...that's social justice in action.

Why is Green even involved? It happened in Madison county, can't Madison county deliver justice?

Is there any reasonable way to remove her? She is an enabler.

It's a good thing his social security number is redacted on the form or someone would surely pretend to be him.

Green's role is limited to the Hinds County cases she suspended the sentences in. MDOC will ask her to revoke the suspended sentences and commit him to prison.

Don't hold your breath however...

With the way Judge Green structured those sentences, I'm unsure if the guilty plea sentences can be used for statutory enhancement purposes now. It's a real problem if they can't. Curious to see how Madison courts deal with that.

Is there any reasonable way to remove her? She is an enabler.

Yes there is. At the ballot box. And I'm sure once the people who vote in her district are made aware of this and her disturbing, similar history, they'll....

Oh. Wait.

I bet he is a registered voter in her district. Hinds County never removes the felons from the voter rolls. Madison County removes them the day they are sentenced. Why would she send her constituents to jail? Hinds County has so many problems with its officials...

@11:31 AM - Agreed but the root problem is "crony votes". Until the voters elect competent candidates based on education and a desire to rid society of guilty criminals, this will continue.

You can bet your tail michael guest is going to hammer his ass to the wall. Good job Greene we will handle it and keep our counties safe from all you thugs

Kingfish is being silly for not allowing posts asking whether or not Madison County justice can trump Green's Hinds orders. The question seems to be the very crux of the matter. Yet it remains unanswered after three attempts to post the question here.

Let me spell it out for you since you are pretty dense. You've made some good comments and ruined every one of them because you just have to be a smart ass. Keep twisting around my name into variations of it and guess what? You're comment doesn't get approved. Don't know any site where your comment gets approved when you insult the owner. Don't like it? Get lost. You won't be missed.

You go, Mr. Fish!

So...those of who are not lawyers and who are not wannabee lawyers are left here, twisting in the wind, without an answer to the question as to whether or not Michael Guest and his band of law enforcement guys can trump the antics of the Jackson Jurdge.

Does her earlier order stand and does she rule on his incarceration going forward or does the crime committed in Ridgeland rule now? How difficult is that question and where is the answer?

Michael Guest will proceed as normal with his prosecution of case. Isn't affected at all by Judge Green and I suspect he will go for habitual offender classification.

However, Judge Green can throw this scumbag into prison for a full fifteen years RIGHT NOW since he has two suspended sentences.

Thanks for that answer. So, I reckon it's left to Guest to roll the dice. Does he wait and see if the boy gets sent up for fifteen or does he proceed with the cost of trying this guy in Madco and hope for more than 15. Not sure we want him back on the streets in fifteen or less.

Guest will do his job and put him away for a long time.

The question is will Judge Green do hers.

If she does, will Guest likely try the Madco case on top of whatever Green imposes, time to be served (hopefully) consecutively, not concurrently? Key word 'likely'.

Final question. If she DOES impose the sentence on him, and Guest tries him for macing the clerk and robbery in Madco will Guest be allowed to introduce his prior record in court or will that be some sort of double-jeopardy?