Jackson Jambalaya

Why hasn't a criminal complaint been filed re: embezzlement?

Mr. Thomas contributed to Weill's recent campaign while touting him on his blog even the point of promoting Weill for the MS Supreme Court. But Thomas failed to his readers that he made the contribution.

Similar to the $900 the Weill campaign paid you in three installments for services rendered. You failed to disclose your employment while touting his campaign and savagely exposing his opponent's past.

Wouldn't the bankruptcy court have to be paid first and then if anything was left then it should go to Ms. Douglas? At least Schwartz has stopped those ads showing law enforcement and emergency personnel telling the injured to contact him. I would imagine that if they were caught doing that, they would lose their jobs. The worst one was when he appeared on the helicopter and was holding the patient's hand. I thought that ambulance chasing was against the law but it didn't seem to apply to him. Hope that the court and Ms.Douglas get their money.

He is being investigated. Just added a sentence to the end. Thanks.

That, and it was filed last month. Why is this the first the public has heard of it? I'm looking at you, CL.

awwww....poor little 9:37. Once again you can't even get your facts right. $950 for web work, $200 for advertising. And I have supported Mr. Weill in every electoral effort of his and told you guys from day one here I was supporting him for circuit judge. I don't see you whining about WLBT or WAPT producing ads for candidates. I didn't give money or time to Mr. Weill. What he paid for was actual work or services. His opponents could've obtained as well. Don't blame me because they choose not to do so. All they have to do is contact me. I'm going to sell ads on this site for next year and any democrat or republican can buy ad space on this site.

After reading this blog for four years, you think I wouldn't have posted Mr. Shamsid-Deen's columns? Damn right. I wouldn't have cared who he was facing, I would've had alot of fun with those no matter what.

Known Vann for many years- doesn't sound like we know all the facts- someone, just speculating, might have embezzled the money from him at his office- Would like to see the response or Answer filed by Schwartz and Leonard before jumping to any conclusions

Answer by RS is in this post and no explanation for Mr. Leonard's actions is offered.

Supported Weill w/ reportable $$$ + a vote & agree w/ 9:37. If U write bout a political race U need 2 fully disclose work 4 pay regardless. Not pay 4 ads cuz ads R obvious. Walk the walk. U'd hammer JFP if they did same.

Wasn't weill's banner ad displayed at the top of this site? If so, was that not a clue that Weill was paying for advertising?

And regardless, what does any of this have to do with the Schwartz and Leonard post?

And regardless, what does any of this have to do with the Schwartz and Leonard post?

Misdirection

Yeah, what Curt said!

Agree with 1:09. 9:37 and 12:24--get a life. the only thing missing is you stomping your foot like a 5 year old. Post is about Schwartz and Leonard. Hope Ms. Doublas is successful.

Yawn.

To answer the second comment from the top.

When there is a Chapter 13, the debtor retains possession of any property that existed before the bankruptcy was filed. So, the debtor has a right to the money first. The debtor is required to make payments to the creditors as set forth in the Chapter 13 plan. But, if this were a Chapter 7, then the money would have been property of the bankrupt estate first and the creditors would be paid first.

I would have expected that the creditors would have filed a motion requesting that the Chapter 13 plan be amended due to the settlement, i.e., to increase any payments being made.