Nine nations have nuclear weapons: USA, Russia, China, France, United Kingdom, India, Pakistan, North Korea, and Israel. Some federal sources claimed Iran was within a few months if not days before it would have a nuclear weapon. That was the justification President Trump used to order Operation Midnight Hammer on June 22, 2025, to attack three Iranian nuclear sites – Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan – with overwhelming munitions to destroy Iran’s cache of nuclear material.
Eight months later, on February 28, 2026, the US and Israel began attacking Iran as a means of ending US-Iran negotiations that had begun the year before in April of 2025. We’re now five months into an on-again-off-again shooting war with Iran with little hope of concluding military operations.
Some American politicians and their media cousins have downplayed threats of Iranian nuclear weapons. Even if Iran were unable to make their own weapon with their own stockpile of nuclear dust, they could conceivably still get a weapon from their allies. Iran promised not to buy a nuclear weapon, but Iran has a long history of defaulting on promises.
Pandora’s nuclear box has already been opened and shared with nations around the world. What will eliminate the further spread of nuclear weapons?
The USA celebrated our 250th birthday last week. Persia, the forerunner of Iran, stopped having birthdays after two or three thousand years of history. Their leaders have always played the long game in negotiations with adversaries. And they’re still here today.
Last week Yaroslav Trofimov began an article in the Wall Street Journal writing, “New outbreak of fighting over the strait [of Hormuz] comes as Tehran sees itself as a winner in the war that would establish a new Pax Iranica in the Middle East.” How could this be? Haven’t the US and Israel practically destroyed any military Iran had? Leadership in Iran, whoever they are, weigh winning and losing differently from how the West sees winning.
Trofimov quotes Karim Sadjadpour, Iran expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, writing, “The Islamic Republic will become even more of a gangster regime. Its takeaway from the war is that concessions are won through coercion—by attacking its neighbors, threatening the Strait of Hormuz and driving up the price of oil.” He explained, “Like Putin’s Russia, the Islamic Republic believes that its security depends not on the prosperity of its people, but on the insecurity of its neighbors.”
To achieve US objectives of no nuclear weapon for Iran, and peace and prosperity among neighbors in the Middle East, we must think differently. Blasting Iran and their proxies continually until they surrender is not likely to end, much less end well.
The US faced similarly minded enemies in WWII. That’s the only time nuclear weapons have been used in warfare. At the time, the US was the only nation that had nuclear weapons. After Russian developed their own nuclear weapons, “mutually assured destruction” became a new international military strategy.
II Peter 3:10 “But the day of the Lord will come like a thief, in which the heavens will pass away with a roar and the elements will be destroyed with intense heat, and the earth and its works will be burned up.”
The USA just celebrated her 250th birthday guaranteeing citizens the free exercise of religion and speech.
Daniel L. Gardner is a columnist who lives in Starkville, MS. You may contact him at PJandMe2@gmail.com.
27 comments:
I'm glad somebody finally acknowledged the fact that it is easier for Iran to buy a nuclear weapon than to make one. This "war" is all about control of oil commerce and Israel's desire to destroy it's enemies.
So, how does one deal with terrorists? Certainly not by negotiating with them and giving in to their demands.
11:35, I’ll acknowledge something - you get all of your news from Tok Tok. For almost 80 years, Israel’s neighbors have tried to push it out or destroy it. Most have now come to the conclusion that ain’t happening and learned to live with Israel. Iran and its proxies are the exception, yet when Israel fights back they are called genocidal war mongers. Life’s not as simple and cut-and-dried as you think it is (you will realize that as you age and become wiser) and you can’t base a position on 30-second videos and ten-second sound bites. Educate yourself then come back here to comment.
If France and the UK are fully Islamized, then it won’t matter what Iran does
Not according to Former President Joe Biden laughing & saying Iran did not have the ability to produce nuclear weapons.
12:06 What is Tok Tok? Netanyahu is not the first national leader who decided that peace can be obtained when his remaining enemies are destroyed. It's not the desire that counts it's the ability to execute and now he can execute....with the help of the U.S. And if you don't believe we would not be doing this war but for the control of oil it's YOU who should educate yourself.
@12:06 and 12:14 - These 2 comments prove that one does NOT have to be educated to comment here.
2:59, please enlighten us
I'll comment as soon as I get some of that Freedom Fuel bought. I'm down to a 1/4 tank and still looking!
It doesn't appear he has to, they proved it themselves with their comments. Maybe you added some more logs to the fire.
2:14, you have such a narrow view of things. Oil? Is this what all this is about? Wow, the education system failed you tremendously.
I’m not sure about anyone’s level of education, but 12:06 has a better understanding of the situation than any other commenters on this thread.
There's no better place to learn about the 'NOO-kyuh-luhr' than the professer from Starkpatch. Class is in secession!
Let me help you reword your last sentence: This was is all about Israel's desire to destroy it's aggressive enemies who are dead set on Israel's destruction.
There ya go. No charge.
To Persia with love :: all you can eat buffet at the Taco Bell and a free salad
Hurry in
War’s over. Another one in the L column for the mighty US. Trump’s own pick for Director of National Intelligence as well as Director of Counterterrorism Intelligence told Trump and Congress that Iran has no nuclear weapons program. Yet Trump bollicked off to war anyway, and now he can’t use his real estate negotiating skill set to back out of it. The strait was open at the start of the war, and now the US is slugging it out to do what? Why, return to the status quo antebellum, of course.
In 2015 and ‘16 Trump said no more no-win, no-end Middle East wars. Yet here he is, up to his ears in one. What turned him, reckon? What could have made him do a 180 in the face of evidence and his own advisors. It does give one pause to ponder, does it not?
8:54, it’s laughable how you let your ideology so skew your view of reality. The U.S. has not, by any stretch of the imagination, lost a war with Iran. We have seriously degraded their ability to be the region’s sponsor of terrorism and eliminated the near term threat of them getting a nuclear weapon. Sure, they can still fire off random missiles at neighbors and shipping in the Straight, but we are slowly but surely reducing their threat. And we are not in a traditional Middle East war; it’s just us punishing Iran for being terroristic thugs, and it’s virtually one-sided. Please approach issues with reason and sanity, and use the same when commenting.
I just know billions have been made off of Trump's daily shoot-from-the-hip decisions have whip-sawed the market . Maybe not a shoot-from-the-hip as we first thought . Right billionaire buddies ?
Calling the United States’ one-sided operations against Iran a war is like calling Todd Mardis’ interaction with his wife a prize fight.
Amazing what Kingfish promotes on this blog.....and he asks for financial support. Fuck you Traitor.
What Mr. Trump should do is declare victory, say that Iran is no longer a nuclear threat, they are totally helpless, stop bombing, bring the military home and say that he has done what no one else could possibly do... ever...and give Israel a few billion in military aid. Just say it. His followers will eat it up like they always do. Case closed.
Maybe we should discuss it at twenty paces after you go f*** yourself.
1:35, you blue-haired nose ring antisemites are real tough hiding anonymously behind a keyboard. In real life if I presented a counter-argument you didn’t agree with you would immediately run towards the nearest safe space while complaining I committed a micro aggression against you, so don’t be trying to act like Dirty Harry here.
I really don’t understand the affinity ultra-liberals have for ultra-conservative Muslim theocracies.
Is it just because their people have brown skin? Really, I don’t get it.
What you and the rest of you Zionists don’t understand is that everyone is noticing. KF tried to pretend on Kim Wade that the reason Tucker is telling the truth now is “for the money” but the reality is that he took a big risk. He could see the Zionist control in the media. But Tucker took a gamble that the people want the truth. It paid off. Jimmy begs for shekels while he peddles Zionist lies and censors the truth about the Zionist terrorism. Jimmy just regurgitates Ben Shapiro and Mark Levin who have tiny, minuscule audiences. Meanwhile Tucker has an enormous audience. Hundreds of millions of viewers of all demographics , enormous reach and influence. Just like Charlie Kirk. Just like Joe Rogan. These aren’t blue haired, nose ring liberals. These are real conservatives. Not Zionist neocons who lie about no more forever wars.
Waaaaaa! You don't like free speech.....just like KF.
The most power military tag teaming with the most powerful Air Force and Irans little guard is still running the show. Kinda gives you vibes of the early nineties and Iraq doesn't it ? It's all about the oil. Not Israels defense.
Post a Comment