In any given publication since 1939, The Journal of Mississippi History has been an invaluable record of the institutional memory of the state of Mississippi. But few editions of the scholarly journal have been more valuable to Mississippians than is the current Vol. 84, No. 1 and No. 2 for the Spring and Summer of 2022.
The current edition chronicles the strange, often torturous path of the Mississippi Legislature to changing Mississippi’s state flag in 2020 and the strong roles played by the Mississippi Department of Archives and History – the Journal’s publisher – and the broader Mississippi Historical Society (organized in 1858) played in bringing that monumental change to fruition.
Mississippi's former state flag was adopted in 1894, some 30 years after slavery was abolished. In 2000, the Mississippi Supreme Court, ruling in a lawsuit filed by the NAACP, found that the state technically had no official flag.
Yet the state’s white majority exhibited a stubborn insistence on clinging to the state’s 1894 Reconstruction Era state flag – which features in the canton corner the Beauregard Battle Flag (also known as the Confederate Battle Flag, the Flag of the Army of Northern Virginia, and the Rebel Flag; used by some Mississippi troops in battle) – according to a 2018 Mississippi Historical Society article on the Mississippi flag by Millsaps College historian Stephanie Rolph.
From 1894 forward, state government either ignored protests about the state flag altogether or procedurally kicked the rusty can down the political road.
Former Democratic Gov. Ronnie Musgrove led the controversial 2001 statewide referendum that gave Mississippi voters an opportunity to change the state flag’s 1894 design to a new one which deleted the Confederate battle flag from the canton corner. Mississippi voters rejected the proposition of changing the state flag at the ballot box on April 17, 2001, by a 2-1 margin – 494,323 votes (64.31 percent) to 273,359 votes (35.61 percent).
Another former Democratic Mississippi governor, the late William Winter, should be remembered for his courage and tenacity on the issue of flag change in this state. He was fearless and doggedly determined.
But the flag change effort that succeeded came under Republican majorities in both houses of the Mississippi Legislature and with the GOP in control of the state’s executive branch offices. The change fomented in an odd combination of disparate but undeniably connected events. House Speaker Philip Gunn and Lt. Gov. Delbert Hosemann did yeoman’s work on the issue.
The combination of the “Black Lives Matter” movement, the aftermath of the 2015 Dylann Roof massacre in South Carolina, the support of business and industrial groups, and increasing impatience by the NCAA and the Southeastern Conference with playing games in states with flags reflecting Confederate symbolisms – along with the express support of the state’s most influential religious groups – paved the way for political success on the issue that had been unlikely only months prior to the legislative votes being taken.
Author Jere Nash aptly and fairly tells the story of that political process. Nash worked as campaign manager former Democratic Gov. Ray Mabus during the 1980s. He served as deputy state auditor and as Mabus' director of policy and chief of staff. Nash went on to work for a number of Democratic candidates and progressive political causes.
Nash co-authored the splendid bipartisan history Mississippi Politics: The Struggle for Power, 1976-2006 alongside Republican political consultant Andy Taggart in 2006. The pair also co-wrote Mississippi Fried Politics: Tall Tales from the Back Rooms in 2008.
In 2020, the Mississippi House voted 92 to 23 and the state Senate voted 37 to 14 for House Bill 1796 to retire the former state flag and design a new one. Katie Blount, the executive director of the MDAH, wrote about that portion of the flag transition that required that agency’s considerable finesse in the journal.
While all are worthy, the current edition of The Journal of Mississippi History should be a part of the libraries of all serious students of history, politics, and social sciences in this state. It is a fascinating and important read. For more information, contactwww.mississippihistory.org or www.mdah.ms.gov.
11 comments:
Salter is no doubt also a fan of Critical Race Theory since it (too) purports to teach (indoctrinate) in a fashion that would agree with his personal narrative.
Giving only parenthetical mention to alternative views on The Flag (or race relations) is far from inclusive, fair and unbiased. Those opposed to the change had no voice in the matter. They only had the option of choosing among several unsavory designs.
If you're giving a man twenty lashes (for whatever reason) and you pause for a minute to listen to his cries and pleas, you can claim you allowed him to express himself and considered his voice, as you continue with the lashes. This is exactly what happened in the (non)conversation in 2020 regarding The Flag. And it's what Salter is guilty of as well.
'What we have here is a failure to communicate' and another reason to distrust government.
"Institutional memory" may well be the biggest problem for the state of Mississippi.
I was born, raised, and lived in Mississippi for 40 years, and I also started a family and a business in Mississippi. I'll always be a Mississippian in my heart, but I left two years ago.
It's remarkable how many Mississippians spend the bulk of their time, energy, and resources on symbolic issues, this being a prime example. Mississippi has much to be proud of and much to be ashamed of, and nearly all of it is in the far-distant past.
Mississippi insists on looking backwards while other states look forward, and the state will continue its decline until that changes.
I have no problem with the new flag. I had no problem with the old flag. What I do have a problem with is the fact that after a record turnout to vote, often waiting over a hour (as I did), the results were neglected. It was an overwhelming vote to keep the old flag. From now on, the argument will be “the results of the vote don’t matter as evidenced and approved by the flag vote.”. Laugh if you want, but that is what is coming.
Always saw the old flag as a flag of surrender and so the change IMO was needed. Living in the past has always been an issue for many Mississippians and that flag embodied the past. Not a very savory one at that. That said, THE PEOPLE voted to keep it and your elected piss in your face and changed it.
We could’ve had an epic mosquito 🦟 flag if weren’t for those boring ass honkeys on the blue ribbon flag commission
Salter brings the word scalawag to mind...
If court historian and presstitute Sid Salter says it's so, well, then, that should settle the matter once and for all.
And look how businesses have stopped fleeing the state and new businesses flock to set up shop now that Our Betters changed our flag for us.
The new flag design is nice looking but the message is "We value things pretty and fragrant".
IMO, a Mockingbird, a warrior-artist, is a better symbol for MS to live up to. It can not only fight cats and hawks ferociously to defend its nest and wing flash to hunt insects but can also learn to sing hundreds of tunes.
Is this really all Sid could think to babble about this week?
I would rather read one of Sid's essays about an air conditioner malfunctioning at a Neshoba County Fair cabin,
... or St. John typing eight paragraphs about the best cinnamon roll in Italy.
Y'all but Sidney some slack. He's well on his way to becoming the new Jerry Mitchell, only with a PERS cushion.
MSU is too stupid to fire him but should have at least made him an independent contractor. He's got pictures of somebody for damned sure.
Sid Salter and Jerry Mitchell need to get a room and get it over with.
Post a Comment