Jackson Jambalaya

This is a chicken-shit thread, Kingfish. She's entitled under the law to expungement. You're becoming more of a peeping-tom every day. When will you be posting photos of her underwear hanging on the clothesline?

Remember when journalists and blogsters attempted to taint the jury pool? That's today.

Judge to jurors: "Remember now...you promised to unsee and disremember everything you read in the paper or on that blog".

Underwear on her clothesline? Hell no, we demand pictures of her modeling them.

For all of you drunks who think you can later dodge your DUI record, the auto insurance industry will always have your record at their fingertips in Nexus Lexus.

Did she meet all of these requirements under MS 63-11-30 Implied Consent?

(13) Expunction.
(a) Any person convicted under subsection (2) or (3) of this section of a first offense of driving under the influence and who was not the holder of a commercial driver’s license or a commercial learning permit at the time of the offense may petition the circuit court of the county in which the conviction was had for an order to expunge the record of the conviction at least five (5) years after successful completion of all terms and conditions of the sentence imposed for the conviction. Expunction under this subsection will only be available to a person:
(i) Who has successfully completed all terms and conditions of the sentence imposed for the conviction;
(ii) Who did not refuse to submit to a test of his blood or breath;
(iii) Whose blood alcohol concentration tested below sixteen one-hundredths percent (.16%) if test results are available;
(iv) Who has not been convicted of and does not have pending any other offense of driving under the influence;
(v) Who has provided the court with justification as to why the conviction should be expunged; and
(vi) Who has not previously had a nonadjudication or expunction of a violation of this section.
(b) A person is eligible for only one (1) expunction under this subsection, and the Department of Public Safety shall maintain a permanent confidential registry of all cases of expunction under this subsection for the sole purpose of determining a person’s eligibility for expunction, for nonadjudication, or as a first offender under this section.
(c) The court in its order of expunction shall state in writing the justification for which the expunction was granted and forward the order to the Department of Public Safety within five (5) days of the entry of the order.

Wasting her time, court time and money.

I would have though she had higher-priority legal concerns at the present time but what do I know? Thanks for the update, KF. As someone who has declared people dead after being hit by drunk drivers I appreciate your diligence in keeping us informed.

She's entitled under the law to expungement.

Hey Chicken-Little. Press coverage makes it no less so. If you prefer journalists and media that pull punches then there are any number of other outlets in Mississippi desperate for new readers.

Remember when journalists and blogsters attempted to taint the jury pool? That's today.

White's legal team can seek a change of venue. If a Judge deems JJ coverage prejudicial then that would be great for KF's business. Win-win.

Hey 9:35…

Wrong statute. The charges were dismissed. Try again. Tip: The answer is yes she has met the requirements to have that charge expunged.

If I understand correctly, the petitioner is not necessarily entitled to an order expunging his/her record but is eligible if he/she meets certain conditions. The Court makes the decision. It's kind of like bond. If the Court determines that wiping a person's record clean is a danger to the public must the Court still grant the expungment? This lady's case is a perfect example of the Court's discretion and need to deny the petition.

Wrong 1:03. What you posted is nothing more than your opinion. Which is equal to the value of a Lincoln-head penny.

Please, Please, Please wait until you have her in prison before awarding her for hiring a good lawyer to erase the public record of her sins.

"For all of you drunks who think you can later dodge your DUI record, the auto insurance industry will always have your record at their fingertips in Nexus Lexus."

Unless, of course, you can come up with 12-15K to hire 'the right' lawyer who can pass a grand on to the record keepers at MHP and another jurisdiction...then the record never is recorded and the insurance company never sees it.

Can't name names of lawyers if I want this to post.