You hypocrites are something else.
JPS Superintendent Earl Watkins gets a sweet severance package:
"His new contract shows he will draw a monthly salary of $18,181.82. The agreement will be terminated with a $36,364 final payment if he takes a full-time position elsewhere.."
http://www.clarionledger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080820/NEWS/808200361/1001
Yes, he cost JPS close to a million dollars, including the lawsuit settlement and his pay. However, this is nothing compared to what you Rebels, Bulldogs, and Golden Eagles pay your football coaches when you fire them. A football coach gets a severance package of a million or more dollars for him to sit on his arse for a few years and everyone thinks that is ok. Let an educator, even a scumbag like Watkins, get a couple of hundred thousand dollars for a year and everyone wants to raise hell about it.
Anyone see a problem?






2 comments:
Just because I am a fan doesn't mean I agree with coaches being given outrageous salaries when they leave -- you can't make that assumption. I don't even like 'em getting crazy money when they are hired. But in most cases, most of the money for those exiting coaches comes from a) private fan foundations or b) idiotic contracts signed by the Universities to begin with.
I live in Jackson on purpose. I supported the bond issue, even campaigned for it. I am a huge supporter of public schools -- and I don't even have kids. But, yeah, I do get a little mad when JPS plans to pay a guy $18,000/month for nothing (and let's be real -- he's not going to do anything) while teachers I know are spending evey extra dime they have on classroom supplies, when the price of school lunches is going up, and many of the schools look like they might fall down if a stiff wind comes up.
If Watkins is getting this money because of an idiotic contract signed by the Board, then let them pay for it out of their own pockets. But as a taxpayer, I have every right in the world to be mad about this mess. My opinions about money for coaches, yea or nay, has nothing to do with it.
What I am focusing on is the level of outrage. Its discussed on talk shows. The newspaper and tv stations raise hell about it. Yet if it was a buyout for a coach, nary a peep out of them or the public. Its the disconnectt i'm pointing out.
Post a Comment