If you were dumb enough to use Google+, well, you got a nasty surprise this week. The Wall Street Journal reported:
Google exposed the private data of hundreds of thousands of users of the Google+ social network and then opted not to disclose the issue this past spring, in part because of fears that doing so would draw regulatory scrutiny and cause reputational damage, according to people briefed on the incident and documents reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.
As part of its response to the incident, the Alphabet Inc. GOOGL 2.73% unit on Monday announced a sweeping set of data privacy measures that include permanently shutting down all consumer functionality of Google+. The move effectively puts the final nail in the coffin of a product that was launched in 2011 to challenge Facebook Inc. FB 0.25% and is widely seen as one of Google’s biggest failures.
A software glitch in the social site gave outside developers potential access to private Google+ profile data between 2015 and March 2018, when internal investigators discovered and fixed the issue, according to the documents and people briefed on the incident. A memo reviewed by the Journal prepared by Google’s legal and policy staff and shared with senior executives warned that disclosing the incident would likely trigger “immediate regulatory interest” and invite comparisons to Facebook’s leak of user information to data firm Cambridge Analytica.
Chief Executive Sundar Pichai was briefed on the plan not to notify users after an internal committee had reached that decision, the people said....
The episode involving Google+, which hasn’t been previously reported, shows the company’s concerted efforts to avoid public scrutiny of how it handles user information, particularly at a time when regulators and consumer privacy groups are leading a charge to hold tech giants accountable for the vast power they wield over the personal data of billions of people..... Rest of article.
4 comments:
They won't have their rabbi (Obama) to protect them this time.
It would be nice to have some better consumer protection laws similar to the Europeans. It just doesn’t seem right when a company like google or equifax hands over highly sensitive data with no worry of any prosecution or fines. It’s clear the current administration doesn’t care about the common consumer and these large corporations know it.
7:13 Nor did the administration before them, or the one before them, etc.....
"...reputational damage..."? I've never seen the word reputation used as an adjective.
Post a Comment