Jackson Jambalaya

Betcha $100 that GlitterGirl is Ladd. Better yet, make that $1000. I'll bet you that much. If you pay close attention you'll figure it out.

Hadn't thought about that until you pointed it out but now I wonder. Naturally I got banned when I started to mix it up with them a little bit.

Difference between those two is this: Lotus is a liberal/progressive and believes what she writes. She stood up when it counted on Scruggs, unlike someone else we know. Despite her thin-skinned nature and politics, I consider her character to be superior to that of Ladd's, as Ladd is nothing but a fraud with an agenda.

Actualy, I think Glitter Girl is Lotus posting under an alter. When Lotus started complaining that the majority of FOLO posters did not seeem to support her agenda, Glitter Girl suddenly arrived. Their writing styles are very similar and GG always agrees with Lotus - that right there is a dead giveaway clue. I think she is pulling a fast one on FOLO readers, the few that are left. NMC should worry that such tactics reflect on his credibility if that is what she is doing on their blog. Maybe he should investigate.

Actualy, I think Glitter Girl is Lotus posting under an alter.

I've actually considered that also. Glitter Girl goes silent at the same times when lotus is gone. Then there frequently are comments like this one that read nearly verbatim as Ladd has posted. The same sources are also linked at the two sites with regularity and at almost the same time.

Ladd has posted under different alters at the JFP many times over the years. She's posted as Stauffer then admitted to have "accidently" posted from "his Mac" after realizing the charade was so obvious. So it wouldn't surprise that she is singing in the folo choir too since the JFP has gone so moribund.

GG is either lotus or Ladd. Strange how bitter all three (two) of them are.

whoooaaaa.

that comment GG made about McCain. I don't see Lotus writing that one but its straight out of quite a few JFP posts. She used to post on Folo as Faith. She also responds to EVERY SINGLE post she might disagree with like someone else we know. Reminds me of the Reason mag thread where she had to reply to everything. She doesn't know how to let things go, not at all. I don't see her shutting down the posters like Kaze on the JFP site that say bush let 9/11 happened, meaning Bush murdered 3000 Americans on American soil if that is true.

I've never read anything written by JFP and/or Ladd - paper, blog or otherwise. Thus, I can't comment on any similarities there. But GG appeared when Lotus starting feeling lonely over at her site, so I really do think it is her. I don't think there is anything that is too low for FOLO anymore. NMC should be embarassed to have his name on that blog.

i don't remember Lotus making such complaints.

Remember she started talking about how fed up she was and she was tempted to shut down the site? Then she took the paint off some conservative posters and told them to start their own blogs and get off FOLO? All that complaining was not just about the lack of donations to her site.

I check out the headlines and the stories on the JFP and FOLO and the utter hypocrisy is hopeless. Republicans have a right to be angry at the MSM, the democratic party and it followers. Just look at this post from Michele Malkin where she highlights the anger and violent hate from the left.

http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/12/crush-the-obamedia-narrative-look-whos-gripped-by-insane-rage/

But, if a few republicans express some real anger, then it is a hate fest by the right. Get real democrats! Stay classy!

hmmmmmmm..........


link?

This is what Lotus calls a personal attack on her:

Link

I'd have to go back over there to get a link, and I've made it a point not to go to FOLO since some kind of KKK video (I didn't watch it, just saw the still shot) was posted with a reference to McCain-Palin. That sort of stuff is unacceptable from either end of the political spectrum.

hmmmm...said: Glittergirl ain't Lotus. Read Kingfish's link in this thread on him getting banned on FOLO and you can tell that GG lost Lotus on a comment closely following. Hell, she's good at losing people on comments. She's a hack, but she ain't Lotus for sure. Ladd either.

There are more than enough people to be "like" someone than to subscribe to paranoic theories of sock puppetry at every turn. And GG ain't quite so smooth in making her points. She may be an understudy, but she ain't smooth enough to be either of them.

Theories of sock puppetry aren't "paranoic" [sic] unless you need them to be so in order to drive home your point.

leave my mutt Triumph alone.

Will this video be condemned at folo?

Will this video be condemned at folo?

I doubt it. They'll consider that reasonable discourse.

Reminds me of the Reason mag thread where she had to reply to everything.