tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2447438783001404385.post2246637535401507149..comments2024-03-28T13:37:35.836-05:00Comments on Jackson Jambalaya: Senate Passes Fetal Heartbeat BillKingfishhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06184990110961727404noreply@blogger.comBlogger54125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2447438783001404385.post-81476459082188614662019-02-11T09:34:27.869-06:002019-02-11T09:34:27.869-06:00I am working against this bill. The MISSISSIPPI Su...I am working against this bill. The MISSISSIPPI Supreme Court will deem it unconstitutional. Ccntact me if you wish to help. Heddy-Dale Matthias MDnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2447438783001404385.post-7993980476564994842019-02-08T21:57:21.805-06:002019-02-08T21:57:21.805-06:00Having a baby is no picnic. It's hard as hell...Having a baby is no picnic. It's hard as hell. I've known women who died during childbirth. The right to an abortion should have been in the Bill of Rights. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2447438783001404385.post-34312520316652054942019-02-07T14:27:24.319-06:002019-02-07T14:27:24.319-06:00@5:31, where will Trump end up? He is a liar, a ch...@5:31, where will Trump end up? He is a liar, a cheat, and a serial philanderer. Will he get to Heaven just by pandering to folks like you on the abortion issue? Wake up. He does not care about you, the babies, or the Christian religion.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2447438783001404385.post-6633990680250823652019-02-07T11:13:02.428-06:002019-02-07T11:13:02.428-06:00Nearly every long winded JJ commenter considers th...Nearly every long winded JJ commenter considers themaelf to be Marcus Tullius Cicero. <br /><br />In reality their illiterate tracts seem more fit to be scrawled in excrement on a bathroom stall at the State Hospital.Citizen Jnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2447438783001404385.post-21554569380208206402019-02-07T10:43:08.584-06:002019-02-07T10:43:08.584-06:00@6:03 PM...um, would you explain just how you know...@6:03 PM...um, would you explain just how you know that a rat's ass is "scaly"? Personal experience? Up close examination? SIGNED: A Bible ThumperAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2447438783001404385.post-27874454215354172322019-02-07T10:04:33.369-06:002019-02-07T10:04:33.369-06:006:18 needs to take a philosophy class. That is a ...6:18 needs to take a philosophy class. That is a really poor post.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2447438783001404385.post-41729745158400197902019-02-07T05:31:21.343-06:002019-02-07T05:31:21.343-06:00Abortionists, women who have abortions. Mother'...Abortionists, women who have abortions. Mother's who get abortions for their teenaged daughters, and the politicians who support it, will all be damned to eternal hell by God Almighty. Only the mudered babies will see the sanctuary of the afterlife in heaven.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2447438783001404385.post-62432744552102889842019-02-06T19:38:10.772-06:002019-02-06T19:38:10.772-06:00@4:11, I do not know and it does not matter. The m...@4:11, I do not know and it does not matter. The mother has rights, so there must be a balance. That balance is reflected by the decision in Roe,Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2447438783001404385.post-5902830676490519752019-02-06T19:34:42.445-06:002019-02-06T19:34:42.445-06:003:25, no, you cannot be a pro-lifer who doesn’t th...3:25, no, you cannot be a pro-lifer who doesn’t think he or she can tell a woman she shouldn’t get an abortion. The “I would never do it but can’t tell anyone else they shouldn’t” position is, at its very core, acceptance of abortion. I mean you no ill will, just answering your question. I assume you would never murder a born person yet would have no issue telling someone else he shouldn’t murder someone. In fact, you may even feel morally obligated to dissuade someone contemplating killing someone. Abortion is murder of an unborn person, premeditation and all. Women who have had abortions deserve mercy and forgiveness if they choose to seek it. The mothers are not the enemy. The enemy is Satan, the father of lies, and it is encumbant upon us to fight in any way we can that is pleasing to God the evil he is perpetrating. That evil includes convincing people of good faith, like yourself, that you should just demure and not take a strong stance in defense of the unborn just because you yourself would never commit the act of murder. Wrong is wrong. I implore you to take that to heart. Be a kind, loving, merciful, courageous defender of life.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2447438783001404385.post-68384552475157530162019-02-06T18:18:32.661-06:002019-02-06T18:18:32.661-06:00At what point does a fetus----earn the right to li...At what point does a fetus----earn the right to life? Yes, EARN.<br /><br />Is it a heartbeat? Is after a certain time period? Or is it after a baby takes its first breath? Fact is, the closer and closer a baby 'to term' the the baby gets, the more weight we give the idea the it is life and therefore deserves protection. <br />This is known as gradualism. A baby gradually gains the right to life. The problem? <br /><br />There is no one school of thought that agrees at exactly what point the baby GAINS the right to life. Some even go so far as to say that using contraceptives is killing babies.<br /><br />So what we have here is a range of time---and different opinions, as to WHEN a fetus gains the right to life. Of course a glob of cells in a woman's baby is 'alive' hearbeat or not, but at what point does it gain a constitutionally protected right to life? <br /><br />This has always been the problem. It's not an issue of weather the thing is alive or not, but at what point does it gain rights?<br /><br />Sure it's alive, but at what point is it's life protected? No one can seem to agree, save for when it's birth certificate is issued. Just because the state of Mississippi says 'heartbeat' doesn't mean another body agrees. One body may state that it needs to have conciousness and breathe oxygen because THAT is what is called birth.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2447438783001404385.post-63987498276792869492019-02-06T18:05:30.001-06:002019-02-06T18:05:30.001-06:00Given the "pro-choice" sentiment that a ...Given the "pro-choice" sentiment that a mom must want the child or the child can be eliminated, then these people can solve the homeless problem in America the same way. Eliminate the person and you eliminate the problem.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2447438783001404385.post-69025770041527958662019-02-06T18:01:54.475-06:002019-02-06T18:01:54.475-06:0012:29 said, "To suggest the Supreme Court has...12:29 said, "To suggest the Supreme Court has sanctioned murder or that Democrats favor murdering babies is imbecilic."<br /><br />So because the government says the destruction of life is okay then that makes it okay. Mao, Stalin, Hitler, and Pol Pot certainly agree with you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2447438783001404385.post-61391865130480239212019-02-06T16:11:57.899-06:002019-02-06T16:11:57.899-06:00@12.29 PM
Nevertheless, none of the cases from Ro...@12.29 PM<br /><br />Nevertheless, none of the cases from Roe forward address the science or define "life."<br /><br />If abortion is not murder, then tell me exactly when "life" begins and the tissue becomes a human entitled to the rights and protections of the US Constitution. And please provide a reasoned and scientific basis for your argument.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2447438783001404385.post-66294361543004402672019-02-06T15:38:17.057-06:002019-02-06T15:38:17.057-06:0010:37, the largest Christian Church on earth makes...10:37, the largest Christian Church on earth makes no distinction for rape, nor does it support euthanasia or execution. You paint with a broad, incorrect brush.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2447438783001404385.post-71491212853268309052019-02-06T15:25:13.425-06:002019-02-06T15:25:13.425-06:00Can you be a pro-lifer who does not believe that i...Can you be a pro-lifer who does not believe that it is none of your business what decision a woman makes with respect to abortion? I do not agree with abortion, but I do not believe I have the right to tell a woman she cannot have an abortion.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2447438783001404385.post-63227876650078684952019-02-06T12:34:36.972-06:002019-02-06T12:34:36.972-06:00Where does Jay Hughes stand on this bill?? Where does Jay Hughes stand on this bill?? Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17511370358095510084noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2447438783001404385.post-5300761466824179752019-02-06T12:29:40.884-06:002019-02-06T12:29:40.884-06:00@8:05 and 8:44, you either have not read Roe or di...@8:05 and 8:44, you either have not read Roe or did not understand it, neither of which come as a surprise. At its essence, Roe was about the mother’s Constitutional right to privacy, not a “right to get an abortion.” Also, the Supreme Court has addressed this and similar issues at least 13 times, most recently in 2000. Roe is settled law and even now Justice Kavanagh took that position during his confirmation hearing. To suggest the Supreme Court has sanctioned murder or that Democrats favor murdering babies is imbecilic. Again, no surprise.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2447438783001404385.post-84675135927061039502019-02-06T12:28:44.753-06:002019-02-06T12:28:44.753-06:00February 6, 2019 at 11:55 AM wrote, "I have h...February 6, 2019 at 11:55 AM wrote, "I have heard many interviews of adults who are products of rap, and I would never say to them 'you should have been aborted.'"<br /><br />Ya know, I too have heard such interviews and for the life of me, I can rarely understand a single word they utter. And when they fire up with the rap, my ears bleed. But I do agree that saying to them they should have been aborted is unreasonably harsh, at least in most cases.<br /><br />Sorry, just trying to inject a little levity and that sentence just jumped out at me.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2447438783001404385.post-43084295009097562422019-02-06T12:22:41.101-06:002019-02-06T12:22:41.101-06:00@ 10:37 why can’t a woman who has not been the vic...@ 10:37 why can’t a woman who has not been the victim of forcible rape take the necessary step to avoid becoming pregnant instead of resorting to abortion after the fact...especially if the idea of pregnancy is “just as traumatic as a rape? If pregnancy really has the potential to be SOOO traumatic as to justify killing a living human being, then said snowflake should go IMMEDIATELY to the closest OB-GYN and demand a hysterectomy. Problem solved....without having to kill a baby. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2447438783001404385.post-22414178325965535162019-02-06T11:55:14.207-06:002019-02-06T11:55:14.207-06:0010:37, please set your hatred of "Bible-thump...10:37, please set your hatred of "Bible-thumpers" aside for a few moments and use your head. It is not about hypocritically picking and choosing which babies are okay. I have heard many interviews of adults who are products of rap, and I would never say to them "you should have been aborted." Stunningly, these people hear such comments regularly. Simply put, stopping abortion from rape is not a politically feasible objective. <br /><br />What many people miss is that if Roe v Wade is overturned, then abortion will roll merrily along. If Roe v Wade is overturned it simply means that abortion becomes a matter for the individual states to forbid or allow. Look at he hue and cry over Roe v Wade, given this acrimony, for "Bible-thumpers" to engage the rape argument is to end any chance of Roe v Wade being overturned. <br /><br />There is no hypocrisy here, only lies from the left.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2447438783001404385.post-81841818323908004992019-02-06T10:37:20.982-06:002019-02-06T10:37:20.982-06:00I'm opposed to abortion but am sick and tired ...I'm opposed to abortion but am sick and tired of the sanctimonious pro-lifers who happily abort fetuses which are a product of rape but deny abortion to women whose pregnancies may just as traumatic as a rape victim's. If pro-lifers are really trying to protect the sanctity of life, then they should oppose abortions for rape victims. They hypocritically pick and choose which babies are okay with them to abort. <br /><br />I also invite the Bible-thumpers to actually read the Bible. The only specific mention of a woman losing a fetus says that if a man causes a woman to lose her baby, then he should pay a monetary fine. The Bible does not say that it is murder and treats it as a property right. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2447438783001404385.post-51696965971748991372019-02-06T10:34:46.608-06:002019-02-06T10:34:46.608-06:00Ignorant people can't help but show it.
This...Ignorant people can't help but show it. <br /><br /><i>This mitzvah is thus compared to offering a korban, sacrifice to G-d - the word korban from the root korov, "to draw close". Taking this comparison further, Rabbeinu Bachya observes how the atonement from the blood on the altar corresponds to the blood draw from the wound at a bris.</i>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2447438783001404385.post-72638043099609968592019-02-06T09:58:26.456-06:002019-02-06T09:58:26.456-06:009:48 is a has problems with analysis. Yes, Moloch...9:48 is a has problems with analysis. Yes, Moloch and Yahweh asked for sacrifice. Moloch asked for child sacrifice as part of efforts to manipulate the forces of the world for personal gain. Yahweh asked for animal sacrifice as atonement for moral failure. There are enormous differences on multiple levels between the two.<br /><br />However, there are similarities in the abortion camp and the Moloch camp in they both favor the death of children.<br /><br />However 9:48 is correct in the sense that if you are building an amoral narrative, truth and reason are inconvenient obstacles. Hence 9:48's argument avoids both truth and reason.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2447438783001404385.post-41103085040491728652019-02-06T08:44:06.224-06:002019-02-06T08:44:06.224-06:00Anyone who takes an honest look at Roe v Wade, whe...Anyone who takes an honest look at Roe v Wade, whether pro-abortion or anti-abortion, has to come to the conclusion that it is simply bad law. Roe v. Wade effectively says that aborting an unborn baby is a right guaranteed by the Constitution. How in the hell do you get there from a reading of the United States Constitution? I am open to anyone illuminating me on this point.<br /><br />At worst, the Supreme Court should have left the legality of abortion up to the states, which would have kept the federal govt out of it altogether. <br /><br />That said, the issue of abortion hinges on one thing - is an unborn baby a life or not? If it is a life, then it's preservation is absolutely guaranteed by the Constitution. Pro-abortionists refuse to address this point and refuse to look at the scientific evidence that clearly points to the fact that an unborn child (call it a fetus if you are more comfortable with that) exhibits substantially all of the traits of a human life actually pretty early in its formation. <br /><br />The argument that "it's my body, and you can't tell me what to do with it" is BS. The law can tell you not to take your arm and swing it so that it hits someone else in the face. The law can tell you not to use your foot to kick someone else. The law can tell you not to use your hands to push someone off of a balcony. Using your body to do harm to someone else is a violation of the law. If an unborn baby/fetus is a "someone else", then using your body (actually using sharp instruments and vacuum equipment) to terminate that "someone else" is against the law - i.e. it is murder.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2447438783001404385.post-42083073780446608122019-02-06T08:41:35.262-06:002019-02-06T08:41:35.262-06:004:38 - right on! Two of my very best friends are ...4:38 - right on! Two of my very best friends are adopted, and they are the best folks you'd ever want to know. It would be a shame if they were never born, and I can't imagine my life without them in it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com